Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28912198›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2018

Frequency of low-value care in Alberta, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Finlay A McAlister, Meng Lin, Jeff Bakal, Stafford Dean

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measuring low-value care in hospital discharge records: evidence from China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023
    Article
  15. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  16. Screening backlogs: How to move forward.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Low-value pharmaceutical care among Dutch GPs: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Finlay A McAlisterDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Meng LinDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jeff BakalDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Stafford DeanAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine how frequently 10 low-value services highlighted by Choosing Wisely are done and what factors influence their provision.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health data from five linked data sets from 2012 to 2015 in the Canadian province of Alberta to determine the frequency with which 10 low-value services were provided.

resultsBetween 2012 and 2015, 162 143 people (4% of all 3 814 536 adult Albertans and 5% of the 3  423 135 who saw a physician at least once in that time frame) received at least one of the 10 low-value services, including 29.8% of Albertans older than 75 years (57 811 of 194 068). The proportion of adults receiving low-value services ranged from carotid artery imaging in 0.1% of asymptomatic adults without cerebrovascular disease, to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in 55.5% of men 75 years or older without a history of prostate cancer. Although age, Charlson scores and frequency of primary care visits were associated with low-value service provision, the directions of the association differed across services; however, higher socioeconomic status, increased frequency of specialist contact and higher ratio of specialists to primary care physicians in the patient's region were associated with an increased risk of receiving all of the low-value services we examined. The low-value services which resulted in the greatest costs to the healthcare system were cervical cancer screening in women older than 65 without history of cervical dysplasia or genital cancer, PSA testing in men older than 75 without history of prostate cancer and preoperative stress testing/cardiac imaging before non-cardiac surgery.

conclusionsEven within a universal coverage healthcare system, the proportion of patients receiving low-value services varied widely (from <0.1% to 56%). Increased use was associated with higher socioeconomic status, increased frequency of specialist contact and higher ratio of specialists to primary care physicians.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAge FactorsAlbertaGuideline AdherenceHealth Services AdministrationHumansInsurance Claim ReviewLogistic ModelsMedical OverusePractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsSpecializationState MedicineUnnecessary Proceduresambulatory carehealthcare quality improvementhealth services research

Identifiers

PMID28912198
OpenAlexW2754703108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.