ArticleBMJ quality & safety2018
Frequency of low-value care in Alberta, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Determinants of the de-implementation of low-value care: a multi-method study.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022Pooled it
- Overuse of diagnostic testing in healthcare: a systematic review.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Pooled it
- Geographical Variations in Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of International Evidence.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Overuse in surgery by deviation from the "Choosing Wisely" campaign recommendations: a surrogate of unnecessary surgery and low-value care.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- DRG payment, financial signals, and low-value hospitalizations in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Low-Cost, High-Volume Health Services Contribute the Most to Unnecessary Health Spending due to Low-Value Care in Japan.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Primary Care Physician Characteristics and Low-Value Care Provision in Japan.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- A retrospective cross-sectional study on district-based socioeconomic status and prostate cancer diagnosis.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Article
- Enablers and barriers to a quaternary prevention approach: a qualitative study of field experts.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted clinical variation at scale: a realist study of implementation strategy mechanisms.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Measuring low-value care in hospital discharge records: evidence from China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023Article
- Article
- Screening backlogs: How to move forward.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Article
- Prevalence and changes of low-value care at acute care hospitals: a multicentre observational study in Japan.BMJ open · 2022Observational
- Identifying drivers of health care value: a scoping review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Low-value pharmaceutical care among Dutch GPs: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine how frequently 10 low-value services highlighted by Choosing Wisely are done and what factors influence their provision.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health data from five linked data sets from 2012 to 2015 in the Canadian province of Alberta to determine the frequency with which 10 low-value services were provided.
resultsBetween 2012 and 2015, 162 143 people (4% of all 3 814 536 adult Albertans and 5% of the 3 423 135 who saw a physician at least once in that time frame) received at least one of the 10 low-value services, including 29.8% of Albertans older than 75 years (57 811 of 194 068). The proportion of adults receiving low-value services ranged from carotid artery imaging in 0.1% of asymptomatic adults without cerebrovascular disease, to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in 55.5% of men 75 years or older without a history of prostate cancer. Although age, Charlson scores and frequency of primary care visits were associated with low-value service provision, the directions of the association differed across services; however, higher socioeconomic status, increased frequency of specialist contact and higher ratio of specialists to primary care physicians in the patient's region were associated with an increased risk of receiving all of the low-value services we examined. The low-value services which resulted in the greatest costs to the healthcare system were cervical cancer screening in women older than 65 without history of cervical dysplasia or genital cancer, PSA testing in men older than 75 without history of prostate cancer and preoperative stress testing/cardiac imaging before non-cardiac surgery.
conclusionsEven within a universal coverage healthcare system, the proportion of patients receiving low-value services varied widely (from <0.1% to 56%). Increased use was associated with higher socioeconomic status, increased frequency of specialist contact and higher ratio of specialists to primary care physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.