Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28912173›Full record

SynthesisHaematologica2017

Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Dennis A Eichenauer, Ingrid Becker, Ina Monsef, Nicholas Chadwick, Vitaliana de Sanctis, Massimo Federico, Catherine Fortpied, Alessandro M Gianni, Michel Henry-Amar, Peter Hoskin and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Haematologica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Dennis A EichenauerFirst Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Ingrid BeckerInstitute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Ina MonsefCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Nicholas ChadwickUniversity College London (UCL) Cancer Trials Centre, UK.
Vitaliana de SanctisDepartment of Radiotherapy, University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Massimo FedericoUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Catherine FortpiedEuropean Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
Alessandro M GianniIstituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Michel Henry-AmarCentre de Traitement des Données du Cancéropôle Nord-Ouest, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Peter HoskinMount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Peter JohnsonCancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, UK.
Stefano LuminariUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Monica BelleiUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Alessandro PulsoniCellular Biotechnology and Hematology Department, University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Matthew R SydesMedical Research Council (MRC), Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), UK.
Pinuccia ValagussaIstituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Simonetta VivianiIstituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Andreas EngertFirst Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Jeremy FranklinInstitute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany jeremy.franklin@uni-koeln.de.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Cologne · DECentre François Baclesse · FREuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEMedical Research Council · GBMount Vernon Cancer Centre · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 9619Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment intensification to maximize disease control and reduced intensity approaches to minimize the risk of late sequelae have been evaluated in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. The influence of these interventions on the risk of secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival is reported in the meta-analysis herein, based on individual patient data from 9498 patients treated within 16 randomized controlled trials for newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma between 1984 and 2007. Secondary malignant neoplasms were meta-analyzed using Peto's method as time-to-event outcomes. For progression-free and overall survival, hazard ratios derived from each trial using Cox regression were combined by inverse-variance weighting. Five study questions (combined-modality treatment

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFollow-Up StudiesHodgkin DiseaseHumansNeoplasms, Second PrimaryOdds RatioProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28912173
PMCPMC5622859
OpenAlexW2756060398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.