Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28912163›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood2018

Neonatal resuscitation using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomised trial in Uganda.

Nicolas J Pejovic, Daniele Trevisanuto, Clare Lubulwa, Susanna Myrnerts Höök, Francesco Cavallin, Josaphat Byamugisha, Jolly Nankunda, Thorkild Tylleskär

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02042118 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Versus Face-mask Ventilation (FMV) in Neonatal Resuscitation at Mulago Hospital, Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre For International HealthRan2014 to 2016Enrolled50ConditionsAsphyxia NeonatorumArmsLaryngeal Mask Airway, Face mask ventilation
NCT03133572 naunknown statusnot on this map

Neonatal Supraglottic Airway Trial: A Single-centre, Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of I-gel® Supraglottic Airway Used in Neonatal Resuscitation in Reducing Early Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre For International HealthRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1,163ConditionsAsphyxia NeonatorumArmsSupraglottic airway, Face-mask
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube placement in neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the role of laryngeal masks in neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Update 2022: interdisciplinary statement on airway management with supraglottic airway devices in pediatric emergency medicine-The laryngeal mask is and remains state of the art : Joint statement of the Institute for Emergency Medicine and Medicine Management (INM), the University Clinic Munich, LMU Munich, Germany, the Working Group for Pediatric Critical Care and Emergency Medicine of the German Interdisciplinary Society for Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), the Medical Directors of Emergency Medical Services in Bavaria (ÄLRD), the Scientific Working Group for Pediatric Anesthesia (WAKKA) of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the Scientific Working Group for Emergency Medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Society of Neonatology and Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (GNPI)].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reply to: "The strength of a randomized controlled trial lies in its design-randomization".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicolas J PejovicCentre for International Health, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-7375
Daniele TrevisanutoDepartment of Pediatrics, Padua University, Padua, Italy.
Clare LubulwaMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Susanna Myrnerts HöökCentre for International Health, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Francesco CavallinIndependent statistician, Padua, Italy.
Josaphat ByamugishaMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Jolly NankundaMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Thorkild TylleskärCentre for International Health, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mulago Hospital · UGKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMortality rates from birth asphyxia in low-income countries remain high. Face mask ventilation (FMV) performed by midwives is the usual method of resuscitating neonates in such settings but may not always be effective. The i-gel is a cuffless laryngeal mask airway (LMA) that could enhance neonatal resuscitation performance. We aimed to compare LMA and face mask (FM) during neonatal resuscitation in a low-resource setting.

settingMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

designThis prospective randomised clinical trial was conducted at the labour ward operating theatre. After a brief training on LMA and FM use, infants with a birth weight >2000 g and requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth were randomised to resuscitation by LMA or FM. Resuscitations were video recorded.

main outcome measuresTime to spontaneous breathing.

resultsForty-nine (24 in the LMA and 25 in the FM arm) out of 50 enrolled patients were analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two arms. Time to spontaneous breathing was shorter in LMA arm than in FM arm (mean 153 s (SD±59) vs 216 s (SD±92)). All resuscitations were effective in LMA arm, whereas 11 patients receiving FM were converted to LMA because response to FMV was unsatisfactory. There were no adverse effects.

conclusionA cuffless LMA was more effective than FM in reducing time to spontaneous breathing. LMA seems to be safe and effective in clinical practice after a short training programme. Its potential benefits on long-term outcomes need to be assessed in a larger trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: This trial was registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov, with registration number NCT02042118.

Indexed as

Laryngeal MasksAsphyxia NeonatorumHumansInfant, NewbornProspective StudiesResuscitationTreatment OutcomeUgandaAsphyxia NeonatorumGlobal HealthLaryngeal MasksNewborn InfantResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID28912163
PMCPMC5865513
OpenAlexW2754703707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.