Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911639›Full record

ArticleJournal of food and drug analysis2017

Designing primers and evaluation of the efficiency of propidium monoazide - Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for counting the viable cells of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus salivarius.

Chieh-Hsien Lai, Sih-Rong Wu, Jen-Chieh Pang, Latha Ramireddy, Yu-Cheng Chiang, Chien-Ku Lin, Hau-Yang Tsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Viability-PCR for the selective detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Gut microbes
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chieh-Hsien LaiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Hung Kuang University, Shalu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Sih-Rong WuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Hung Kuang University, Shalu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Jen-Chieh PangDepartment of Food and Beverage Management, Vanung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.
Latha RamireddyDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Hung Kuang University, Shalu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Yu-Cheng ChiangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Hung Kuang University, Shalu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Chien-Ku LinDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Hung Kuang University, Shalu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Hau-Yang TsenDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Hung Kuang University, Shalu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Hungkuang University · TWVanung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of using propidium monoazide (PMA) real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to count the viable cells of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus salivarius in probiotic products. Based on the internal transcription spacer and 23S rRNA genes, two primer sets specific for these two Lactobacillus species were designed. For a probiotic product, the total deMan Rogosa Sharpe plate count was 8.65±0.69 log CFU/g, while for qPCR, the cell counts of L. gasseri and L. salivarius were 8.39±0.14 log CFU/g and 8.57±0.24 log CFU/g, respectively. Under the same conditions, for its heat-killed product, qPCR counts for L. gasseri and L. salivarius were 6.70±0.16 log cells/g and 7.67±0.20 log cells/g, while PMA-qPCR counts were 5.33±0.18 log cells/g and 5.05±0.23 log cells/g, respectively. For cell dilutions with a viable cell count of 8.5 log CFU/mL for L. gasseri and L. salivarius, after heat killing, the PMA-qPCR count for both Lactobacillus species was near 5.5 log cells/mL. When the PMA-qPCR counts of these cell dilutions were compared before and after heat killing, although some DNA might be lost during the heat killing, significant qPCR signals from dead cells, i.e., about 4-5 log cells/mL, could not be reduced by PMA treatment. Increasing PMA concentrations from 100 μM to 200 μM or light exposure time from 5 minutes to 15 minutes had no or, if any, only minor effect on the reduction of qPCR signals from their dead cells. Thus, to differentiate viable lactic acid bacterial cells from dead cells using the PMA-qPCR method, the efficiency of PMA to reduce the qPCR signals from dead cells should be notable.

Indexed as

Lactobacillus gasseriLigilactobacillus salivariusAzidesBacterial LoadDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersLactobacillusMicrobial ViabilityPolymerase Chain ReactionPropidiumReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAzidesDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersPropidiumpropidium monoazideLactobacillus gasseriLactobacillus salivariuspropidium monoazidequantitative polymerase chain reactionviable and heat-killed cells

Identifiers

PMID28911639
PMCPMC9328820
OpenAlexW2558549079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.