Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911634›Full record

ArticleJournal of food and drug analysis2017

Extraction and quantification of polyphenols from kinnow (Citrus reticulate L.) peel using ultrasound and maceration techniques.

Muhammad N Safdar, Tusneem Kausar, Saqib Jabbar, Amer Mumtaz, Karam Ahad, Ambreen A Saddozai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 375 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phenolic Characterisation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad N SafdarInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Tusneem KausarInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Saqib JabbarFood Science and Product Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Amer MumtazFood Science and Product Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Karam AhadEcotoxicology Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ambreen A SaddozaiFood Science and Product Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Pakistan Agricultural Research Council · PKUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An investigation was carried out to extract polyphenols from the peel of kinnow (Citrus reticulate L.) by maceration and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) techniques. The antioxidant potential of these polyphenols was evaluated using ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and superoxide radical scavenging assays; and their antimicrobial activity was assessed against bacterial strains Staphyloccoccus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Salmonella typhimurium. The highest extraction yield was obtained through the solvent ethanol at 80% concentration level, whereas UAE was a more efficient technique and yielded comparatively higher polyphenol contents than maceration. Maximum polyphenols were extracted with 80% methanol [32.48 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g extract] using UAE, whereas minimum phenolics (8.64 mg GAE/g extract) were obtained with 80% ethyl acetate through the maceration technique. Elevated antioxidant activity of kinnow peel extracts was exhibited in three antioxidant assays, where 80% methanolic extracts showed the highest antioxidant activity (27.67±1.11mM/100 g for FRAP) and the highest scavenging activity, 72.83±0.65% and 64.80±0.91% for DPPH and superoxide anion radical assays, respectively. Strong correlations between total polyphenols and antioxidant activity were recorded. Eleven phenolic compounds-including five phenolic acids and six flavonoids-were identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography. Ferulic acid and hesperidin were the most abundant compounds whereas caffeic acid was the least abundant phenolic compound in kinnow peel extracts. Maximum inhibition zone was recorded against S. aureus (16.00±0.58 mm) whereas minimum inhibition zone was noted against S. typhimurium (9.00±1.16 mm). It was concluded that kinnow mandarin peels, being a potential source of phenolic compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, may be used as an ingredient for the preparation of functional foods.

Indexed as

CitrusAntioxidantsBiphenyl CompoundsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFlavonoidsOxidation-ReductionPicratesPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsStaphylococcus aureus1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazylAntioxidantsBiphenyl CompoundsFlavonoidsPicratesPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsantimicrobial activityantioxidant capacitykinnow peelmacerationphenolic compoundsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID28911634
PMCPMC9328816
OpenAlexW2547958380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.