Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911512›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2017

Cardioprotective Effects of HSP72 Administration on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Takashi Tanimoto, Missag H Parseghian, Takehiro Nakahara, Hideki Kawai, Navneet Narula, Dongbin Kim, Robert Nishimura, Richard H Weisbart, Grace Chan, Richard A Richieri and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cellular protection from HCell stress & chaperones · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mechanism of Phosgene-Induced Acute Lung Injury and Treatment Strategy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular Imaging of the Heart.Comprehensive Physiology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Takashi TanimotoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Missag H ParseghianRubicon Biotechnology, Lake Forest, California.
Takehiro NakaharaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Hideki KawaiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Navneet NarulaWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Dongbin KimIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Robert NishimuraVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; University of California Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Richard H WeisbartVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; University of California Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Grace ChanVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Richard A RichieriRubicon Biotechnology, Lake Forest, California.
Nezam HaiderIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Farhan ChaudhryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Glenn T ReynoldsRubicon Biotechnology, Lake Forest, California.
John BillimekUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Francis G BlankenbergLucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, California.
Partho P SenguptaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Artiom D PetrovIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Takashi AkasakaWakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
H William StraussIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Jagat NarulaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: narula@mountsinai.org.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USRubicon Biotechnology (United States) · USUniversity of California System · USWakayama Medical University · JPCornell University · USLucile Packard Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

Intracellular targeting Hsp70 for myocardial cytoprotection after an infarctionR43HL122012 · NHLBI · RUBICON BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI PARSEGHIAN, MISSAG HAGOP · 2014 to 2014
$223k
NHLBI NIH HHS R43 HL122012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough early reperfusion is the most desirable intervention after ischemic myocardial insult, it may add to damage through oxidative stress.

objectivesThis study investigated the cardioprotective effects of a single intravenous dose of heat shock protein-72 (HSP72) coupled to a single-chain variable fragment (Fv) of monoclonal antibody 3E10 (3E10Fv) in a rabbit ischemia-reperfusion model. The Fv facilitates rapid transport of HSP72 into cells, even with intact membranes.

methodsA left coronary artery occlusion (40 min) reperfusion (3 h) model was used in 31 rabbits. Of these, 12 rabbits received the fusion protein (Fv-HSP72) intravenously. The remaining 19 control rabbits received a molar equivalent of 3E10Fv alone (n = 6), HSP72 alone (n = 6), or phosphate-buffered saline (n = 7). Serial echocardiographic examinations were performed to assess left ventricular function before and after reperfusion. Micro-single-photon emission computed tomography imaging of

resultsMyocardial annexin-V uptake was 43% lower in the area at risk (p = 0.0003) in Fv-HSP72-treated rabbits compared with control animals receiving HSP72 or 3E10Fv alone. During reperfusion, troponin I release was 42% lower and the echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction 27% higher in the Fv-HSP72-treated group compared with control animals. Histopathological analyses confirmed penetration of 3E10Fv-containing molecules into cardiomyocytes in vivo, and treatment with Fv-HSP72 showed fewer apoptotic nuclei compared with control rabbits.

conclusionsSingle-dose administration of Fv-HSP72 fusion protein at the time of reperfusion reduced myocardial apoptosis by almost one-half and improved left ventricular functional recovery after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits. It might have potential to serve as an adjunct to early reperfusion in the management of myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyHSP72 Heat-Shock ProteinsMaleMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryRabbitsSingle-Chain AntibodiesHSP72 Heat-Shock ProteinsSingle-Chain Antibodiesapoptosiscytoprotectionheat shock proteinsmyocardial infarctionnecrosis

Identifiers

PMID28911512
PMCPMC5659834
OpenAlexW2756372793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.