Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911128›Full record

ArticleInternational health2017

Charting a path forward: policy analysis of China's evolved DRG-based hospital payment system.

Rui Liu, Jianwei Shi, Beilei Yang, Chunlin Jin, Pengfei Sun, Lingfang Wu, Dehua Yu, Linping Xiong, Zhaoxin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trends and outcomes ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui LiuDepartment of Health Service Management, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Jianwei ShiYangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China.
Beilei YangTongji University College of Economic and Management, Shanghai 200092, China.
Chunlin JinShanghai Medical Information Center, Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai 200031, China.
Pengfei SunTongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Lingfang WuShanghai Medical Information Center, Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai 200031, China.
Dehua YuYangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China.
Linping XiongDepartment of Health Service Management, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhaoxin WangYangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: At present, the diagnosis-related groups-based prospective payment system (DRG-PPS) that has been implemented in China is merely a prototype called the simplified DRG-PPS, which is known as the 'ceiling price for a single disease'. Given that studies on the effects of a simplified DRG-PPS in China have usually been controversial, we aim to synthesize evidence examining whether DRGs can reduce medical costs and length of stay (LOS) in China. Methods: Data were searched from both Chinese [Wan Fang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI)] and international databases (Web of Science and PubMed), as well as the official websites of Chinese health departments in the 2004-2016 period. Only studies with a design that included both experimental (with DRG-PPS implementation) and control groups (without DRG-PPS implementation) were included in the review. Results: The studies were based on inpatient samples from public hospitals distributed in 12 provinces of mainland China. Among them, 80.95% (17/21) revealed that hospitalization costs could be reduced significantly, and 50.00% (8/16) indicated that length of stay could be decreased significantly. In addition, the government reports showed the enormous differences in pricing standards and LOS in various provinces, even for the same disease. Conclusions: We conclude that the simplified DRGs are useful in controlling hospitalization costs, but they fail to reduce LOS. Much work remains to be done in China to improve the simplified DRG-PPS.

Indexed as

Diagnosis-Related GroupsEconomics, HospitalPolicy MakingProspective Payment SystemChinaHospitalizationHumansLength of StayChinaEvaluationPaymentSimplified DRG-PPS

Identifiers

PMID28911128
PMCPMC5881274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.