Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911092›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Concurrent and sequential initiation of ovarian function suppression with chemotherapy in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of TEXT and SOFT.

M M Regan, B A Walley, P A Francis, G F Fleming, I Láng, H L Gómez, M Colleoni, C Tondini, G Pinotti, M Salim and 8 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00066690 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Ovarian Function Suppression and the Role of Exemestane as Adjuvant Therapies for Premenopausal Women With Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorETOP IBCSG Partners FoundationRan2003 to 2024Enrolled3,066ConditionsEstrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer, Progesterone Receptor Positive Tumor, Recurrent Breast Carcinoma, Stage IA Breast CancerArmsExemestane, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Oophorectomy, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Radiation Therapy
NCT00066703 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Trial Evaluating The Role Of Exemestane Plus GnRH Analogue As Adjuvant Therapy For Premenopausal Women With Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorETOP IBCSG Partners FoundationRan2003 to 2024Enrolled2,672ConditionsBreast CancerArmsexemestane, tamoxifen, triptorelin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Breast cancer: an up-to-date review and future perspectives.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sequential versus concurrent adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for HR+ early breast cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Endocrine Therapy in Early Breast Cancer.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.

M M ReganDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
B A WalleyUniversity of Calgary and Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Calgary, Canada.
P A FrancisDivision of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
G F FlemingThe University of Chicago Medical Center and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, USA.
I LángNational Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Medical Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
H L GómezDivision of Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Lima, Peru.
M ColleoniDivision of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Milan.
C TondiniMedical Oncology, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Bergamo.
G PinottiMedical Oncology, ASST Sette Laghi-Ospedale di Circolo and Fondazione Macchi and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Varese, Italy.
M SalimAllan Blair Cancer Center, Regina, Canada.
S SpazzapanMedical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Aviano, Italy.
V ParmarAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Mumbai, India.
T RuhstallerBreast Center St. Gallen, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), St. Gallen.
E A AbdiAustralia & New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group and International Breast Cancer Study Group, The Tweed Hospital, Griffith University Gold Coast, Tweed Heads, Australia.
R D GelberDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
A S CoatesInternational Breast Cancer Study Group and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
A GoldhirschEuropean Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Milan, Italy.
O PaganiOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bellinzona.
Harvard University · USAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology · USBreast Center · CHCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITGriffith University · AUInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEInternational Breast Cancer Study Group · CHNational Institute of Oncology · HUOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITSwiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research · CHTata Memorial Hospital · INThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
SWOG - Foreign Accrual under UMiU10CA032102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D. · 1985 to 2013
$141.3M
ECOG OPERATIONS OFFICE (IBCSG)U10CA021115 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI COMIS, ROBERT L · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
PRIMARY CANCER THERAPY GROUP--NSABP (HEADQUARTERS)U10CA012027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2012
$117.2M
NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
PRIMARY BREAST CANCER THERAPY--BIOSTATISTICS CENTERU10CA069651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2012
$52.1M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
NCIC Foreign AccrualsU10CA077202 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI EISENHAUER, ELIZABETH · 1998 to 2013
$14.6M
IBCSG STATISTICAL CENTER--A BREAST CANCER STUDY RESOURCEU24CA075362 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REGAN, MEREDITH M · 1997 to 2015
$7.5M
EASTERN COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA016116 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORASTIERE, ARLENE ANN · 1985 to 2013
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CA032102NCI NIH HHS U10 CA012027NCI NIH HHS U10 CA016116NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021115NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032102NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037377NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069651NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069974NCI NIH HHS U10 CA077202NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U24 CA075362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend that higher-risk premenopausal patients should receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of adjuvant endocrine therapy. If chemotherapy is also given, it is uncertain whether to select concurrent or sequential OFS initiation. DESIGN AND

methodsWe analyzed 1872 patients enrolled in the randomized phase III TEXT and SOFT trials who received adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and upon randomization to an OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy, initiated gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-agonist triptorelin. Breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was compared between patients who received OFS concurrently with chemotherapy in TEXT (n = 1242) versus sequentially post-chemotherapy in SOFT (n = 630). Because timing of trial enrollment relative to adjuvant chemotherapy differed, we implemented landmark analysis re-defining BCFI beginning 1 year after final dose of chemotherapy (median, 15.5 and 8.1 months from enrollment to landmark in TEXT and SOFT, respectively). As a non-randomized treatment comparison, we implemented comparative-effectiveness propensity score methodology with weighted Cox modeling.

resultsDistributions of several clinico-pathologic characteristics differed between groups. Patients who were premenopausal post-chemotherapy in SOFT were younger on average. The median duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 18 weeks in both groups. There were 231 (12%) BC events after post-landmark median follow-up of about 5 years. Concurrent use of triptorelin with chemotherapy was not associated with a significant difference in post-landmark BCFI compared with sequential triptorelin post-chemotherapy, either in the overall population (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.72; P = 0.72; 4-year BCFI 89% in both groups), or in the subgroup of 692 women <40 years at diagnosis (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.84) who are less likely to develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea.

conclusionBased on comparative-effectiveness modeling of TEXT and SOFT after about 5 years median follow-up, with limited statistical power especially for the subgroup <40 years, neither detrimental nor beneficial effect of concurrent administration of OFS with chemotherapy on the efficacy of adjuvant therapy that includes chemotherapy was detected. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00066690 and NCT00066703.

Indexed as

PremenopauseAdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvaryAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonaladjuvant therapyGnRH-agonisthormone receptor-positiveovarian function suppressionpremenopausaltriptorelin

Identifiers

PMID28911092
PMCPMC5834112
OpenAlexW2744317320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.