Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911065›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Development of an integrated electronic platform for patient self-report and management of adverse events during cancer treatment.

P Holch, L Warrington, L C A Bamforth, A Keding, L E Ziegler, K Absolom, C Hector, C Harley, O Johnson, G Hall and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Differential effects of an electronic symptom monitoring intervention based on the age of patients with advanced cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

P HolchPsychology Group, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, City Campus, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds.
L WarringtonPatient Reported Outcomes Group: Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds.
L C A BamforthPatient Reported Outcomes Group: Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds.
A KedingDepartment of Health Sciences, Heslington, University of York, York.
L E ZieglerInstitute of Health Sciences.
K AbsolomPatient Reported Outcomes Group: Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds.
C HectorPsychology Group, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, City Campus, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds.
C HarleySchool of Healthcare: Baines Wing.
O JohnsonSchool of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds.
G HallLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, Leeds.
C MorriseRAPID Project Management Group, Leeds, UK.
G VelikovaPatient Reported Outcomes Group: Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds.
University of Leeds · GBChapel Allerton Hospital · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNational Institute of Health Sciences · LKUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1209-10031Department of Health RP-PG-0611-20008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant adverse events (AE) during cancer therapy disrupt treatment and escalate to emergency admissions. Approaches to improve the timeliness and accuracy of AE reporting may improve safety and reduce health service costs. Reporting AE via patient reported outcomes (PROs), can improve clinician-patient communication and making data available to clinicians in 'real-time' using electronic PROs (ePROs) could potentially transform clinical practice by providing easily accessible records to guide treatment decisions. This manuscript describes the development of eRAPID (electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice) is a National Institute for Health Research-funded programme, a system for patients to self-report and manage AE online during and after cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multidisciplinary team of IT experts, staff and patients developed using agile principles a secure web application interface (QStore) between an existing online questionnaire builder (QTool) displaying real-time ePRO data to clinicians in the electronic patient record at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Hierarchical algorithms were developed corresponding to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading using the QTool question dependency function. Patient advocates (N = 9), patients (N = 13), and staff (N = 19) usability tested the system reporting combinations of AE.

resultsThe eRAPID system allows patients to report AE from home on PC, tablet or any web enabled device securely during treatment. The system generates immediate self-management advice for low or moderate AE and for severe AE advice to contact the hospital immediately. Clinicians can view patient AE data in the electronic patient record and receive email notifications when patients report severe AE.

conclusionsEvaluation of the system in a randomised controlled trial in breast, gynaecological and colorectal cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy is currently underway. To adapt eRAPID for different treatment groups, pilot studies are being undertaken with patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy and upper gastrointestinal surgery. ISRCTN88520246.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsSelf ReportSystems IntegrationAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentsadverse eventsCTCAEelectronic patient recordselectronic patient-reported outcomesintegrationpatient self-management

Identifiers

PMID28911065
PMCPMC5834137
OpenAlexW2704172323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.