Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28911004›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2017

Inherent aerobic capacity-dependent differences in breast carcinogenesis.

Henry J Thompson, Lee W Jones, Lauren G Koch, Steven L Britton, Elizabeth S Neil, John N McGinley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Exercise on the Tumour Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henry J ThompsonCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1173, USA.
Lee W JonesDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA.
Lauren G KochDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Steven L BrittonDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Elizabeth S NeilCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1173, USA.
John N McGinleyCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1173, USA.
Colorado State University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Exercise, Breast Cancer Prevention, and MechanismsR01CA100693 · NCI · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI THOMPSON, HENRY J · 2004 to 2019
$3.4M
Resource for Rat Genetic Models of Aerobic CapacityP40OD021331 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI KOCH, LAUREN GERARD · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100693NIH HHS P40 OD021331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although regular physical activity is associated with improvement in aerobic capacity and lower breast cancer risk, there are heritable sets of traits that affect improvement in aerobic capacity in response to physical activity. Although aerobic capacity segregates risk for a number of chronic diseases, the effect of the heritable component on cancer risk has not been evaluated. Therefore, we investigated breast carcinogenesis in rodent models of heritable fitness in the absence of induced physical activity. Female offspring of N:NIH rats selectively bred for low (LIAC) or high (HIAC) inherent aerobic capacity were injected intraperitoneally with 1-methyl-1-nitrosurea (70 mg/kg body wt). At study termination 33 weeks post-carcinogen, cancer incidence (14.0 versus 47.3%; P < 0.001) and multiplicity (0.18 versus 0.85 cancers per rat; P < 0.0001) were significantly decreased in HIAC versus LIAC rats, respectively. HIAC had smaller visceral and subcutaneous body fat depots than LIAC and activity of two proteins that regulated the mammalian target of rapamycin, protein kinase B (Akt), and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase were suppressed and activated, respectively, in HIAC. Although many factors distinguish between HIAC and LIAC, it appears that the protective effect of HIAC against breast carcinogenesis is mediated, at least in part, via alterations in core metabolic signaling pathways deregulated in the majority of human breast cancers.

Indexed as

Physical Conditioning, AnimalAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisFemaleMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMethylnitrosoureaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRatsRisk FactorsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAMP-Activated Protein KinasesBiomarkers, TumorMethylnitrosoureaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID28911004
PMCPMC6075545
OpenAlexW2739186705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.