ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017
Vascular disrupting agent in pancreatic and hepatic tumour allografts: observations of location-dependent efficacy by MRI, microangiography and histomorphology.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Development and characterization of a rat brain metastatic tumor model by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and histomorphology.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022Article
- Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis.American journal of cancer research · 2022Review
- New Heterocyclic Combretastatin A-4 Analogs: Synthesis and Biological Activity of Styryl-2(3Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Non-Invasive Evaluation of Acute Effects of Tubulin Binding Agents: A Review of Imaging Vascular Disruption in Tumors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Role of Microtubules in Pancreatic Cancer: Therapeutic Progress.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Predicting Clinical Efficacy of Vascular Disrupting Agents in Rodent Models of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers: An Overview with Imaging-Histopathology Correlation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Intra-individual comparison of therapeutic responses to vascular disrupting agent CA4P between rodent primary and secondary liver cancers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Sequential Administrations of a Vascular-Disrupting Agent, High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound, and a Radioactively labeled Necrosis Avid Compound for Eradicating Solid Malignancies.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumours growing in organs of different vascular environment could exhibit diverse responses to vascular disrupting agent (VDA). This study was aimed to identify in vivo imaging biomarkers for evaluation of pancreatic and hepatic tumours and comparison of their responses to a VDA Combretastatin A4 Phosphate (CA4P) using multiparametric MRI.
methodsMale WAG/Rij rats were used for orthotopic pancreatic head tumour and hepatic tumour implantation; tumour growth was monitored by 3D isotropic MRI using a 3.0-T clinic scanner. Therapeutic intervention using CA4P was investigated by in vivo quantitative MRI measurements including T2/T1 relaxation mapping, diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhancement (DCE) imaging. Animals were scarified 10 h after CA4P treatment for ex vivo validation using microangiography and histomorphology.
resultsState-of-the-art clinical MRI protocols were successfully adapted for imaging small animal tumour with high reliability. One hour after CA4P injection, marked vascular shutdown was detected with DCE MRI in both pancreatic and hepatic tumours. However, 10 h later, therapeutic necrosis was limited in pancreatic tumours compared with that in hepatic tumours (P<0.01). Heterogeneous therapeutic changes were depicted in tumour lesions using pixel-wise Tofts model, which was generated from dynamic T1 mapping. In addition, tumour responses including haemorrhage, oedema and necrosis were detected using quantitative T2/T1 relaxation maps and diffusion kurtosis images, and were validated using histomorphology.
conclusionsUsing multiparametric imaging biomarkers, hepatic tumours were found to be significantly more responsive to CA4P than pancreatic tumours, which could be of reference for designing future clinical trials on this agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.