Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28910821›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

Vascular disrupting agent in pancreatic and hepatic tumour allografts: observations of location-dependent efficacy by MRI, microangiography and histomorphology.

Ting Yin, Yewei Liu, Ronald Peeters, Yuanbo Feng, Jie Yu, Uwe Himmelreich, Raymond Oyen, Yicheng Ni

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis.American journal of cancer research · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ting YinTheragnostic Laboratory, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yewei LiuTheragnostic Laboratory, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ronald PeetersDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yuanbo FengTheragnostic Laboratory, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Jie YuTheragnostic Laboratory, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Uwe HimmelreichDivision of Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Raymond OyenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yicheng NiTheragnostic Laboratory, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumours growing in organs of different vascular environment could exhibit diverse responses to vascular disrupting agent (VDA). This study was aimed to identify in vivo imaging biomarkers for evaluation of pancreatic and hepatic tumours and comparison of their responses to a VDA Combretastatin A4 Phosphate (CA4P) using multiparametric MRI.

methodsMale WAG/Rij rats were used for orthotopic pancreatic head tumour and hepatic tumour implantation; tumour growth was monitored by 3D isotropic MRI using a 3.0-T clinic scanner. Therapeutic intervention using CA4P was investigated by in vivo quantitative MRI measurements including T2/T1 relaxation mapping, diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhancement (DCE) imaging. Animals were scarified 10 h after CA4P treatment for ex vivo validation using microangiography and histomorphology.

resultsState-of-the-art clinical MRI protocols were successfully adapted for imaging small animal tumour with high reliability. One hour after CA4P injection, marked vascular shutdown was detected with DCE MRI in both pancreatic and hepatic tumours. However, 10 h later, therapeutic necrosis was limited in pancreatic tumours compared with that in hepatic tumours (P<0.01). Heterogeneous therapeutic changes were depicted in tumour lesions using pixel-wise Tofts model, which was generated from dynamic T1 mapping. In addition, tumour responses including haemorrhage, oedema and necrosis were detected using quantitative T2/T1 relaxation maps and diffusion kurtosis images, and were validated using histomorphology.

conclusionsUsing multiparametric imaging biomarkers, hepatic tumours were found to be significantly more responsive to CA4P than pancreatic tumours, which could be of reference for designing future clinical trials on this agent.

Indexed as

AllograftsAngiographyAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeovascularization, PathologicPancreatic NeoplasmsRatsStilbenesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicfosbretabulinStilbenes

Identifiers

PMID28910821
PMCPMC5680470
OpenAlexW2755706035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.