ArticleJAMA oncology2018
HLA-Mismatched Microtransplant in Older Patients Newly Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Microtransplantation Interest Group.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Microtransplantation improves the outcome of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center study with long-term follow-up.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clonal Evolution of Myeloid Malignancies Treated With Microtransplantation: A Single-Centre Experience.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive risk model of mild cognitive impairment in patients with malignant haematological diseases after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- HLA-mismatched stem cell microtransplant prolonged overall survival and promoted immunological reconstitution for multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Hematopoietic stem cell microtransplantation: current situation and challenges.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Review
- Effects of different conditioning regimens on HLA-mismatched microtransplantation and changes in fine immune indices in acute myeloid leukaemia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Micro-transplantation in an elderly patient with very high risk MDS:A case report and literature review.Leukemia research reports · 2024Article
- Harnessing allogeneic CD4Fukushima journal of medical science · 2023Review
- Myeloid Sarcoma as a Presentation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Blastic Phase in the Course of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Hematopoietic stem cell microtransplantation in patients aged over 70 with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter study.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Hyper-CVAD-Based Stem Cell Microtransplant as Post-Remission Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Stem cells translational medicine · 2022Article
- Current status and prospects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China.Chinese medical journal · 2022Review
- Case report: Rare persistent complete donor chimerism and GVHD following micro-transplantation from HLA haplotype homozygous donors.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Microtransplantation for myeloid sarcoma: Two case reports.Leukemia research reports · 2022Article
- Alloantigen-activated (AAA) CD4Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Article
- Chimerism, the Microenvironment and Control of Leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Non-Ablative Chemotherapy Followed by HLA-Mismatched Allogeneic CD3Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Adoptive immunotherapy with CB following chemotherapy for patients with refractory myeloid malignancy: chimerism and response.Blood advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceThe outcome of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory. Recent studies have shown that HLA-mismatched microtransplant could improve outcomes in such patients.
objectiveTo evaluate outcomes in different age groups among older patients with newly diagnosed AML who receive HLA-mismatched microtransplant. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis multicenter clinical study included 185 patients with de novo AML at 12 centers in China, the United States, and Spain in the Microtransplantation Interest Group. Patients were divided into the following 4 age groups: 60 to 64 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 74 years, and 75 to 85 years. The study period was May 1, 2006, to July 31, 2015. EXPOSURES: Induction chemotherapy and postremission therapy with cytarabine hydrochloride with or without anthracycline, followed by highly HLA-mismatched related or fully mismatched unrelated donor cell infusion. No graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis was used. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point of the study was to evaluate the complete remission rates, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival in different age groups. Additional end points of the study included hematopoietic recovery, graft-vs-host disease, relapse rate, nonrelapse mortality, and other treatment-related toxicities.
resultsAmong 185 patients, the median age was 67 years (range, 60-85 years), and 75 (40.5%) were female. The denominators in adjusted percentages in overall survival, leukemia-free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality are not the sample proportions of observations. The overall complete remission rate was not significantly different among the 4 age groups (75.4% [52 of 69], 70.2% [33 of 47], 79.1% [34 of 43], and 73.1% [19 of 26). The 1-year overall survival rates were 87.7%, 85.8%, and 77.8% in the first 3 age groups, which were much higher than the rate in the fourth age group (51.7%) (P = .004, P = .008, and P = .04, respectively). The 2-year overall survival rates were 63.7% and 66.8% in the first 2 age groups, which were higher than the rates in the last 2 age groups (34.2% and 14.8%) (P = .02, P = .03, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). The 1-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality were 10.2%, 0%, 3.4%, and 26.0% in the 4 age groups and 8.1% in all patients. The median times to neutrophil and platelet recovery were 12 days and 14 days after induction chemotherapy, respectively. Five patients had full or mixed donor engraftment, and 30.8% (8 of 26) of patients demonstrated donor microchimerism. Two patients (1.1%) developed severe acute graft-vs-host disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Microtransplant achieved a high complete remission rate in AML patients aged 60 to 85 years and higher 1-year overall survival in those aged 60 to 74 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.