ArticlePloS one2017
Reference equations for the six-minute walk distance in the healthy Chinese population aged 18-59 years.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Six-Minute Walk Distance in Breast Cancer Survivors-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Prospective feasibility study of a telehealth platform for community-based NCD risk assessment by community health leaders in rural northern Thailand.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Females and Exercise Capacity Impairment in Heart Failure: A Sex-Focused Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Dose-Response Effect of Physical Prehabilitation on Major Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events and Disability Levels After Cardiac Surgery in Frail Patients.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- Stepping Towards Health: A Cross-Sectional Study of Hypertension, Mobility, and Endurance Among Saudi Adults Aged 50 Years and Older.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of mild coronavirus disease 2019: Pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Sex differences of post-Covid patients undergoing outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.Biology of sex differences · 2024Observational
- Normative values in healthy adults for the 6-minute and 2-minute walk tests in Belgium and Vietnam: implications for clinical practice.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- The 6-minute Run Test: Validation and Reference Equations for Adults.International journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Perioperative Exercise Testing in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women of Reproductive Age: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Prognostic Role of Metabolic Exercise Testing in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Reference standards for the 6-min walk test in Croatian older adults.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of physical health status beyond daily step count using a wearable activity sensor.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Reference equations for the six-minute walking distance in obese Chinese subjects more than 40 years old.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022Article
- Mean Six Minute Walk Distance of Healthy Healthcare Workers of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2022Article
- The successful rehabilitation of a 75-year-old female with debilitating long COVID: A case report.Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi · 2022Article
- Six-minute walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from a general population sample.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- Determinants and Prediction Equations of Six-Minute Walk Test Distance Immediately After Cardiac Surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Six-minute walking distance in healthy Chinese people older than 60 years.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Article
- Determinants of Performance in the Timed Up-and-Go and Six-Minute Walk Tests in Young and Old Healthy Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a safe, simple, inexpensive tool for evaluating the functional exercise capacity of patients with chronic respiratory disease. However, there is a lack of standard reference equations for the six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in the healthy Chinese population aged 18-59 years.
aimsThe purposes of the present study were as follows: 1) to measure the anthropometric data and walking distance of a sample of healthy Chinese Han people aged 18-59 years; 2) to construct reference equations for the 6MWD; 3) to compare the measured 6MWD with previously published equations.
methodThe anthropometric data, demographic information, lung function, and walking distance of Chinese adults aged 18-59 years were prospectively measured using a standardized protocol. We obtained verbal consent from all the subjects before the test, and the study design was approved by the ethics committee of Wenzhou People's Hospital. The 6MWT was performed twice, and the longer distance was used for further analysis.
resultsA total of 643 subjects (319 females and 324 males) completed the 6MWT, and average walking distance was 601.6±55.51 m. The walking distance was compared between females and males (578±49.85 m vs. 623±52.53 m; p < 0.0001) and between physically active subjects and sedentary subjects (609.3±56.17 m vs. 592±53.23 m; p < 0.0001). Pearson's correlation indicated that the 6MWD was significantly correlated with various demographic and the 6MWT variables, such as age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), heart rate after the test and the difference in the heart rate before and after the test. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that age and height were independent predictors associated with the 6MWD. The reference equations from white, Canadian and Chilean populations tended to overestimate the walking distance in our subjects, while Brazilian and Arabian equations tended to underestimate the walking distance. There was no significant difference in the walking distance between Korean reference equations and the results of the current study.
conclusionIn summary, age and height were the most significant predictors of the 6MWD, and regression equations could explain approximately 34% and 28% of the distance variance in the female and male groups, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.