Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28910254›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2017

Organizational level indicators to address health equity work in local public health agencies: A scoping review.

Katherine Salter, Rosana Salvaterra, Deborah Antonello, Benita E Cohen, Anita Kothari, Marlene Janzen LeBer, Suzanne LeMieux, Kathy Moran, Katherine Rizzi, Jordan Robson and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Indicators to guide health equity work in local public health agencies: a locally driven collaborative project in Ontario.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katherine SalterGraduate Program, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Elborn College, Western University, London, ON, N6A 1H1, Canada. kcharle2@uwo.ca.
Rosana SalvaterraPeterborough County-City Health Unit, Peterborough, ON, Canada.
Deborah AntonelloAlgoma Public Health, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada.
Benita E CohenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Anita KothariGraduate Program, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Elborn College, Western University, London, ON, N6A 1H1, Canada.
Marlene Janzen LeBerSchool of Leadership & Social Change, Brescia University College, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Suzanne LeMieuxSudbury and District Health Unit, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
Kathy MoranDurham Region Health Department, Whitby, ON, Canada.
Katherine RizziSchool of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Jordan RobsonAlgoma Public Health, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada.
Caroline WaiToronto Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine what organizational level indicators exist that could be used by local Ontario public health agencies to monitor and guide their progress in addressing health equity.

methodThis scoping review employed Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) six-stage framework. Multiple online databases and grey literature sources were searched using a comprehensive strategy. Studies were included if they described or used indicators to assess an organization's health equity activity. Abstracted indicator descriptions were classified using the roles for public health action identified by the Canadian National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health (NCCDH). Health equity experts participated in a consultation phase to examine items extracted from the literature. SYNTHESIS: Eighteen peer-reviewed studies and 30 grey literature reports were included. Abstracted indicators were considered for 1) relevance for organizational assessment, 2) ability to highlight equity-seeking populations, and 3) potential feasibility for application. Twenty-eight items formed the basis for consultation with 13 selected health equity experts. Items considered for retention were all noted to require significant clarification, definition and development. Those eliminated were often redundant or not an organizational level indicator.

conclusionFew evidence-based, validated indicators to monitor and guide progress to address health inequities at the level of the local public health organization were identified. There is a need for continued development of identified indicator items, including careful operationalization of concepts and establishing clear definitions for key terms.

Indexed as

Public Health AdministrationHealth EquityHumansOntario

Identifiers

PMID28910254
PMCPMC6972185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.