Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28910150›Full record

Trial reportCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals2017

Phase I/II Trial of Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Radioimmunotherapy, Gemcitabine, and Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Fluorodeoxyuridine Postresection of Liver Metastasis for Colorectal Carcinoma.

Benjamin Cahan, Lucille Leong, Lawrence Wagman, David Yamauchi, Stephen Shibata, Sharon Wilzcynski, Lawrence E Williams, Paul Yazaki, David Colcher, Paul Frankel and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin CahanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Lucille LeongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Lawrence WagmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
David YamauchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Stephen ShibataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Sharon WilzcynskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Lawrence E WilliamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Paul YazakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
David ColcherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Paul FrankelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Anna WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Andrew RaubitschekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
John ShivelyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
Jeffrey Y C WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte, California.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReport the feasibility, toxicities, and long-term results of a Phase I/II trial of

methodsPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver postresection or ablation to minimum disease were eligible. Each cohort received HAI of FUdR for 14 days on a dose escalation schedule. The maximum HAI FUdR dose level planned was 0.2 mg/kg/day, which is the standard dose for HAI FUdR alone. On day 9,

resultsSixteen patients were treated on this study. A maximum tolerated dose of 0.20 mg/kg/day of HAI FUdR combined with RIT at 16.6 mCi/m

conclusionThis study demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and potential utility of HAI FUdR, RIT, and systemic gemcitabine. The trimodality approach does not have higher hematologic toxicities than seen in prior RIT-alone studies. Future efforts evaluating RIT in colorectal cancer should integrate RIT with systemic and regional therapies in the minimal tumor burden setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFloxuridineGemcitabineHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCarcinoembryonic AntigenDeoxycytidineFloxuridineGemcitabineCEAclinical trialcolon cancermonoclonal antibodiesradioimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28910150
PMCPMC5646801
OpenAlexW2789862753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.