Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28906361›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Is there an extraclinical value of automated breast volume scanner compared with hand-held ultrasound?: A pilot study.

Jia Zhan, Xue-Hong Diao, Yun Pang, Yan Wang, Lin Chen, Yue Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia ZhanDepartment of Ultrasound Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Xue-Hong Diao
Yun Pang
Yan Wang
Lin Chen
Yue Chen
Huadong Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the extraclinical value of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) in the diagnosis of breast tumor compare to hand-handle ultrasound (HHUS).One hundred twenty-four patients with breast tumor were performed HHUS and ABVS before operation. The research focused on whether there were newly found tumors or new findings on the coronal planes by using ABVS compared with HHUS. Then, the classification adjustments of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) were made according to new findings on the coronal planes by using ABVS.There are totally 166 breast tumors found in 124 patients by HHUS, while 8 more were observed by ABVS, 4 of which were malignant and the rest were benign. The sensitivity and specificity of ABVS coronal plane findings were 37.0% and 92.5%, respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 before the corrected classification versus 0.93 after the corrected classification, there were no significant differences (P > .05).There was no significant extraclinical value in differentiating diagnosis of malignant tumors and benign breast tumors by ABVS comparing to HHUS. However, those minimal lesions missed diagnosis could be found by ABVS with continuously automatic scanning.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPattern Recognition, AutomatedUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMastectomyMiddle AgedOrgan SizePilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID28906361
PMCPMC5604630
OpenAlexW2755850716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.