Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28906355›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2017

Combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and interrupted dosing sorafenib improves patient survival in early-intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A post hoc analysis of the START trial.

Teng-Yu Lee, Chen-Chun Lin, Chiung-Yu Chen, Tsang-En Wang, Gin-Ho Lo, Chi-Sen Chang, Yee Chao

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Teng-Yu LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung Division of Hepatology, Liver Research Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Chang Gung University, Linkou National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei Department of Medical Research, E-Da Hospital, School of Medicine for International Students, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-Chun Lin
Chiung-Yu Chen
Tsang-En Wang
Gin-Ho Lo
Chi-Sen Chang
Yee Chao
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWI-Shou University · TWLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveThe survival benefit of treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib remains uncertain. We compared the survival of patients treated with TACE and sorafenib with that of patients treated with TACE alone.

methodsThis was a post hoc analysis of the Study in Asia of the Combination of TACE with Sorafenib in Patients with HCC (START) trial. All patients who received TACE and interrupted dosing of sorafenib for early or intermediate-stage HCC in Taiwan from 2009 to 2010 were recruited into the TACE and sorafenib group. They were randomly matched 1:1 by age, sex, Child-Pugh score, tumor size, tumor number, and tumor stage with patients from Taichung Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan who received TACE alone and who fulfilled the selection criteria of the START trial during the same time period (control group). Patient survival [cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR)] of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared.

resultsThe baseline characteristics of the 36 patients in each group were similar. Tumor response rates were significantly better in the TACE and sorafenib group (P < .04). Overall survival of the TACE and sorafenib group was also significantly better than that of the control (TACE alone) group over the 2 years [78%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 64-91 vs 49, 95% CI 32-66; P = .012]. In the multivariate regression analysis, TACE and sorafenib was found to be independently associated with a decreased risk of mortality (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.89; P = .015). Multivariate stratified analyses verified this association in each patient subgroup (all HR < 1.0).

conclusionWith a high patient tolerance to an interrupted sorafenib dosing schedule, the combination of TACE with sorafenib was associated with improved overall survival in early-intermediate stage HCC when compared with treatment with TACE alone.

Indexed as

Chemoembolization, TherapeuticAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCombined Modality TherapyDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProportional Hazards ModelsAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID28906355
PMCPMC5604624
OpenAlexW2754556903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.