Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28905827›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2017

Refractive and ocular biometric profile of children with a history of laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity.

Savleen Kaur, Jaspreet Sukhija, Deeksha Katoch, Mansi Sharma, Ramanuj Samanta, Mangat R Dogra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Refractive status, biometric components, and functional outcomes of patients with threshold retinopathy of prematurity: systemic review and a 17-year longitudinal study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. IMI-Management and Investigation of High Myopia in Infants and Young Children.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  6. Myopia in India.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Savleen KaurDepartment of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jaspreet SukhijaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Deeksha KatochDepartment of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Mansi SharmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ramanuj SamantaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Mangat R DograDepartment of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndian children belong to a diverse socioeconomic strata with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) developing in mature, higher birth weight babies as well. The purpose of our study is to analyze the long-term status of refractive errors and its relationship with ocular biometry in children with ROP who were laser treated at a tertiary center in North India.

methodsCross sectional study. Children (<16 years) enrolled from January 2014 to December 2014 with a history of laser treatment for ROP and examined for refractive and biometric status.

resultsThirty-six children presenting to us at the mean age of 7.37 ± 3.07 years (6-15 years) were included. Mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.05 D ± 5.10. 75% were myopic, with high astigmatism in 31%. Higher lens thickness (P = 0.03) and higher SE (P = 0.002) at 1 year postnatal age were predictors of larger SE. 79.4% achieved a favorable functional outcome (visual acuity ≥20/40). 5.88% achieved unsatisfactory outcome (<20/200) despite having a favorable structural outcome.

conclusionThere are a substantial number of children who develop myopia and high astigmatism while undergoing laser treatment for ROP. We found myopia in our cohort to be lenticular and greater axial length contributing to the development of high myopia. An initial large refractive error predicts the future development of myopia in these children. Nearly 6% of patients with good structural outcome have unexplained subnormal vision. Our threshold for prescribing glasses in these children should be low.

Indexed as

Refraction, OcularAdolescentBiometryChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleMyopiaOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetinopathy of PrematurityRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28905827
PMCPMC5621266
OpenAlexW2755619950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.