ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018
Simple method for RF pulse measurement using gradient reversal.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time optimal control-based RF pulse design under gradient imperfections.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Iterative correction of RF envelope distortion with GRATER-measured waveforms.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate a simple method for measuring the envelope of small-tip radiofrequency (RF) excitation waveforms in MRI, without extra hardware or synchronization. THEORY AND
methodsGradient reversal approach to evaluate RF (GRATER) involves RF excitation with a constant gradient and reversal of that gradient during signal reception to acquire the time-reversed version of an RF envelope. An outer-volume suppression prepulse is used optionally to preselect a uniform volume. GRATER was evaluated in phantom and in vivo experiments. It was compared with the programmed waveform and the traditional pick-up coil method.
resultsIn uniform phantom experiments, pick-up coil, GRATER, and outer-volume suppression + GRATER matched the programmed waveforms to less than 2.1%, less than 6.1%, and less than 2.4% normalized root mean square error, respectively, for real RF pulses with flip angle less than or equal to 30°, time-bandwidth product 2 to 8, and two to five excitation bands. For flip angles greater than 30°, GRATER measurement error increased as predicted by Bloch simulation. Fat-water phantom and in vivo experiments with outer-volume suppression + GRATER demonstrated less than 6.4% normalized root mean square error.
conclusionsThe GRATER sequence measures small-tip RF envelopes without extra hardware or synchronization in just over two times the RF duration. The sequence may be useful in prescan calibration and for measurement and precompensation of RF amplifier nonlinearity. Magn Reson Med 79:2642-2651, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.