Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28905486›Full record

ArticleBJU international2018

Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer: a propensity score-weighted European multicentre study.

Malte W Vetterlein, Philipp Gild, Luis A Kluth, Thomas Seisen, Michael Gierth, Hans-Martin Fritsche, Maximilian Burger, Chris Protzel, Oliver W Hakenberg, Nicolas von Landenberg and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Perioperative Blood Transfusions and Bladder Cancer Outcomes.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Malte W VetterleinDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5987-3883
Philipp GildDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Luis A KluthDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas SeisenDepartment of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France.
Michael GierthDepartment of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hans-Martin FritscheDepartment of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Maximilian BurgerDepartment of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Chris ProtzelDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Oliver W HakenbergDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Nicolas von LandenbergDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Florian RoghmannDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0299-489X
Joachim NoldusDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Philipp NuhnDepartment of Urology, Mannheim Medical Centre, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Armin PychaDepartment of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Michael RinkDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Felix K-H ChunDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias MayDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth Medical Centre, Straubing, Germany.
Margit FischDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Atiqullah AzizDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3114-9604
PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group
Universität Hamburg · DECaritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEBarmherzige Brüder Klinikum St. Elisabeth in Straubing · DEHeidelberg University · DESigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · ATSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effect of peri-operative blood transfusion (PBT) on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), using a contemporary European multicentre cohort. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe Prospective Multicentre Radical Cystectomy Series (PROMETRICS) includes data on 679 patients who underwent RC at 18 European tertiary care centres in 2011. The association between PBT and oncological survival outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. Imbalances in clinicopathological features between patients receiving PBT vs those not receiving PBT were mitigated using conventional multivariable adjusting as well as inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

resultsOverall, 611 patients had complete information on PBT, and 315 (51.6%) received PBT. The two groups (PBT vs no PBT) differed significantly with respect to most clinicopathological features, including peri-operative blood loss: median (interquartile range [IQR]) 1000 (600-1500) mL vs 500 (400-800) mL (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of receipt of PBT in multivariable logistic regression analysis were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-9.71; P < 0.001), body mass index (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001), type of urinary diversion (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; P = 0.013), blood loss (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.40; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.37-5.00; P = 0.004), and ≥pT3 tumours (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.48; P = 0.041). In 531 patients with complete data on survival outcomes, unweighted and unadjusted survival analyses showed worse overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality rates for patients receiving PBT(P < 0.001, P = 0.017 and P = 0.001, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, those differences no longer held true. PBT was not associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.58; P = 0.8), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55-2.05; P = 0.9), cancer-specific mortality (sub-HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.62-1.92; P = 0.8) and other-cause mortality (sub-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.85; P > 0.9) in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. The same held true in conventional multivariable Cox and competing-risks analyses, where PBT could not be confirmed as a predictor of any given endpoint (all P values >0.05).

conclusionThe present results did not show an adverse effect of PBT on oncological outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAnalysis of VarianceBlood Transfusion, AutologousCohort StudiesCystectomyDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalEuropeFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMultivariate AnalysisPerioperative CarePrognosisPropensity Scoreblood transfusioncystectomypropensity scorerecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID28905486
OpenAlexW2754155362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.