SynthesisDrug safety2018
Use of Antihypertensive Drugs and Risk of Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cutaneous effects of antihypertensive drugs: A comprehensive narrative review of side effects, management, and prevention.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Review
- Photosensitizing Drugs and Risk of Skin Cancer in Women-A Prospective Population-Based Study.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2025Article
- Risk of malignancy in adult patients with congenital heart disease: a clinical practice review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Current Status and Future Perspective of Onco-Hypertension.American journal of hypertension · 2024Review
- Antihypertensive Medications and Risk of Melanoma and Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024Article
- Heart failure pharmacotherapy and cancer: pathways and pre-clinical/clinical evidence.European heart journal · 2024Review
- Use of antihypertensive drugs and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a nationwide nested case-control study.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Use of Thiazide Diuretics and Risk of All Types of Skin Cancers: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2022Review
- Review
- Stress-induced Norepinephrine Downregulates CCL2 in Macrophages to Suppress Tumor Growth in a Model of Malignant Melanoma.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020Article
- Hydrochlorothiazide use and the risk of skin cancer in patients with hypertensive disorder: a nationwide retrospective cohort study from Korea.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020Article
- Use of Antidepressants and Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Prospective Registry-Based Case-Control Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Drug-Induced Melanoma: Irbesartan Induced Cutaneous Melanoma! First Description in the World Literature!Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Irbesartan Induced Cutaneous Melanoma! Second Case in the Medical Literature!Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSeveral antihypertensive drugs are photosensitizing and may promote the development of malignant melanoma (MM), but evidence remains inconsistent. We sought to quantify the association between use of antihypertensive drugs and MM risk.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to August 17, 2017 to identify observational studies that reported the MM risk associated with the use of antihypertensive drugs. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsOverall, we included eight observational studies (two cohort studies and six case-control studies). Compared with non-use, use of diuretics (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.03-1.17) or β-adrenergic blocking agents (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.37) was significantly associated with increased risk of MM. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.95-1.23), angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.95-1.31), and calcium channel blockers (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.72-1.74) was not significantly associated with increased risk of MM.
conclusionsCurrent evidence from observational studies suggests that use of diuretics or β-adrenergic blocking agents may be associated with increased risk of MM. Further large well-conducted prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.