Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28905283›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Chrysotile effects on the expression of anti-oncogene P53 and P16 and oncogene C-jun and C-fos in Wistar rats' lung tissues.

Yan Cui, Yuchan Wang, Jianjun Deng, Gongli Hu, Faqin Dong, Qingbi Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan CuiSchool of Public Health, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yuchan WangSchool of Public Health, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jianjun DengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, 404 Hospital of Mianyang, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Gongli HuSchool of Public Health, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Faqin DongKey Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and the Resource Recycle, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. fqdong@swust.edu.cn.
Qingbi ZhangSchool of Public Health, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. qingbizhang@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-2448
Southwest Medical University · CNSichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital · CNSouthwest University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Department of Sichuan Province Natural Science Foundation of China 14JC0126Key Program of National Nature Science Project of China 41130746National Natural Fund Project of China 41472046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chrysotile is the most widely used form of asbestos worldwide. China is the world's largest consumer and second largest producer of chrysotile. The carcinogenicity of chrysotile has been extensively documented, and accumulative evidence has shown that chrysotile is capable of causing lung cancer and other forms of cancer. However, molecular mechanisms underlying the tumorigenic effects of chrysotile remained poorly understood. To explore the carcinogenicity of chrysotile, Wistar rats were administered by intratracheal instillation (by an artificial route of administration) for 0, 0.5, 2, or 8 mg/ml of natural chrysotile (from Mangnai, Qinghai, China) dissolved in saline, repeated once a month for 6 months (a repeated high-dose exposure which may have little bearing on the effects following human exposure). The lung tissues were analyzed for viscera coefficients and histopathological alterations. Expression of P53, P16, C-JUN, and C-FOS was measured by western blotting and qRT-PCR. Our results found that chrysotile exposure leads the body weight to grow slowly and lung viscera coefficients to increase in a dose-dependent manner. General sample showed white nodules, punctiform asbestos spots, and irregular atrophy; moreover, HE staining revealed inflammatory infiltration, damage of alveolar structures, agglomerations, and pulmonary fibrosis. In addition, chrysotile can induce inactivation of the anti-oncogene P53 and P16 and activation of the proto-oncogenes C-JUN and C-FOS both in the messenger RNA and protein level. In conclusion, chrysotile induced an imbalanced expression of cancer-related genes in rats' lung tissue. These results contribute to our understanding of the carcinogenic mechanism of chrysotile.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsbestos, SerpentineBlotting, WesternChinaCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Gene Expression RegulationGenes, Tumor SuppressorLungMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junRats, WistarTumor Suppressor Protein p53Asbestos, SerpentineCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junTumor Suppressor Protein p53CancerC-fosChrysotileC-junP16P53

Identifiers

PMID28905283
OpenAlexW2755570926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.