ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2017
Data Sharing Mandates, Developmental Science, and Responsibly Supporting Authors.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.Wellcome open research · 2021Pooled it
- Navigating the new NIH Data Management Sharing plan: the NIH HEAL Initiative Data2Action DMPTool template.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Data reporting quality and semantic interoperability increase with community-based data elements (CoDEs). Analysis of the open data commons for spinal cord injury (ODC-SCI).Experimental neurology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive overview of microbiome data in the light of machine learning applications: categorization, accessibility, and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- The Journal of Youth and Adolescence at 50: Completing the Move Toward a Curator Model of Editing.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2021Article
- Biomedical Data Sharing Among Researchers: A Study from Jordan.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide.PloS one · 2020Article
- Presubmission Inquiries: Problematic, Counterproductive, and Unnecessary.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data sharing has come of age. Long expected as a professional courtesy but rarely honored, data sharing is now highlighted in codes of ethics, supported by research communities, required by leading funding organizations, and variously encouraged and mandated by journals and even publishers. These developments reveal how sharing generates many benefits, all of which go to the integrity of the scientific process. Yet, sharing remains a complex phenomenon. This Editorial explains the journal’s response to the publisher’s mandate to establish an appropriate data sharing policy for the Journal of Youth and Adolescence. It describes the need to balance the benefits of sharing with its costs for authors publishing in multidisciplinary, developmental science journals like this one. For this journal and at this time, that balance leads us to err on the side of caution, which means supporting those who created their data and not coercing public sharing as a condition for publishing. This approach recognizes authors’ reliance on a wide variety of data, the needs of differentially situated authors, the requirements of robust peer review, and the potential harms that can come from editors’ unilateral sharing mandates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28905163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.