ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2017
Exploring evidence of positive selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for different traits.
Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating multi-layer perceptron and random forest in an ensemble framework for improved genomic prediction accuracy and SHAP-derived interpretability of residual feed intake in cattle.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Detection of homozygosity and heterozygosity regions in mediterranean sheep breeds revealed by high-density SNP array.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Bovine Genome Database: new curated collection of selective sweeps in bovine populations across the world.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Integrating whole-genome resequencing data reveals adaptive selection signatures in sheep populations under extreme environments.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- A comprehensive genome-wide analysis for signatures of selection in goat (genus Capra) revealed new candidate genes for environmental adaptation and productive traits.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative genomics sheds light on mammalian and avian gene regulation and phenotypic evolution.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evidence of early genomic selection in Holstein Friesian across African and European ecosystems.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Search for Ancient Selection Traces in Faverolle Chicken Breed (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Advancing the Indian cattle pangenome: characterizing non-reference sequences in Bos indicus.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Computational Identification of Milk Trait Regulation Through Transcription Factor Cooperation in Murciano-Granadina Goats.Biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Insights into Adaption and Growth Evolution: Genome-Wide Copy Number Variation Analysis in Chinese Hainan Yellow Cattle Using Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association study for stayability at different calvings in Nellore beef cattle.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Pleomorphic adenoma gene1 in reproduction and implication for embryonic survival in cattle: a review.Journal of animal science · 2024Review
- Characterization of heterozygosity-rich regions in Italian and worldwide goat breeds.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identification of Heilongjiang crossbred beef cattle pedigrees and reveals functional genes related to economic traits based on whole-genome SNP data.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study for Test-Day Milk Yield, Proteins, and Composition Traits of Crossbred Dairy Cattle in Ethiopia.International journal of genomics · 2024Article
- Genome-wide scan for runs of homozygosity in South American Camelids.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Detection of candidate genes affecting milk production traits in sheep using whole-genome sequencing analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since domestication, the genome landscape of cattle has been changing due to natural and artificial selection forces resulting in several general and specialized cattle breeds of the world. Identifying genomic regions affected due to these forces in livestock gives an insight into the history of selection for economically important traits and genetic adaptation to specific environments of the populations under consideration. This study explores the genes/genomic regions under selection in relation to the phenotypes of Holstein, Hanwoo, and N'Dama cattle breeds using Tajima's D, XP-CLR, and XP-EHH population statistical methods. The whole genomes of 10 Holstein (South Korea), 11 Hanwoo (South Korea), and 10 N'Dama (West Africa-Guinea) cattle breeds re-sequenced to ~11x coverage and retained 37 million SNPs were used for the study. Selection signature analysis revealed 441, 512, and 461 genes under selection from Holstein, Hanwoo, and N'Dama cattle breeds, respectively. Among all these, seven genes including ARFGAP3, SNORA70, and other RNA genes were common between the breeds. From each of the gene lists, significant functional annotation cluster terms including milk protein and thyroid hormone signaling pathway (Holstein), histone acetyltransferase activity (Hanwoo), and renin secretion (N'Dama) were enriched. Genes that are related to the phenotypes of the respective breeds were also identified. Moreover, significant breed-specific missense variants were identified in CSN3, PAPPA2 (Holstein), C1orf116 (Hanwoo), and COMMD1 (N'Dama) genes. The genes identified from this study provide an insight into the biological mechanisms and pathways that are important in cattle breeds selected for different traits of economic significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28905131What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.