ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017
Surgical patient selection and counseling.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to establish a prosthetic urology center of excellence.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- A survey related to patients' satisfaction about anaesthetic care at a tertiary care center in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Influence of Frailty on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Analysis of a Controlled Cohort of 408 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Current Management of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Impact of structured checklist-based preoperative counseling versus standard counseling on postoperative patient-reported outcomes after elective surgery.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Optimizing Recovery After Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Release Surgery: The Role of Counseling in Pain Management and Perioperative Functional Enhancement.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Complications and troubleshooting in primary penile prosthetic surgery-a review.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- The future of penile implants IJIR special edition: 50International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Patient selection, counseling and preparation for penile prosthesis.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Association between Preoperative Steroids and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- Accidental Low-Velocity Penetrating Brain Injury by Glass Marble.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Contemporary Management of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Views from the PelvEx Collaborative.Cancers · 2022Review
- Minimally invasive Heller myotomy with partial posterior fundoplication for the treatment of achalasia: long-term results from a tertiary referral center.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Proximal Extracapsular Tunneling: A Simple Technique for the Management of Impending Cylinder Erosion and Complications Related to Corporal Dilation.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
- Preoperative Psychological Evaluation for Patients Referred for Penile Prosthesis Implantation.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
- Penile implant infection prevention part 1: what is fact and what is fiction? Wilson's Workshop #9.International journal of impotence research · 2020Review
- Intraoperative Use of Betadine Irrigation is Associated With a 9-Fold Increased Likelihood of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Results From a Retrospective Case-Control Study.Sexual medicine · 2020Article
- Patient selection protocol for the Penuma® implant: suggested preoperative evaluation for aesthetic surgery of the penis.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
- Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery.The journal of sexual medicine · 2018Article
- Infection risk of undergoing multiple penile prostheses: an analysis of referred patient surgical histories.International journal of impotence research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of patient selection and counseling are ultimately to enhance successful outcomes. However, the definition for success is often narrowly defined in published literature (ability to complete surgery, complications, satisfaction) and fails to account for patient desires and expectations, temporal changes, natural history of underlying diseases, or independent validation. Factors associated with satisfaction and dissatisfaction are often surgery-specific, although correlation with pre-operative expectations, revisions, and complications are common with most procedures. The process of appropriate patient selection is determined by the integration of patient and surgeon factors, including psychological capacity to handle unsatisfactory results, baseline expectations, complexity of case, and surgeon volume and experience. Using this model, a high-risk scenario includes one in which a low-volume surgeon performs a complex case in a patient with limited psychological capacity and high expectations. In contrast, a high-volume surgeon performing a routine case in a male with low expectations and abundant psychiatric reserve is more likely to achieve a successful outcome. To further help identify patients who are at high risk for dissatisfaction, a previously published mnemonic is recommended: CURSED Patient (compulsive/obsessive, unrealistic, revision, surgeon shopping, entitled, denial, and psychiatric). Appropriate patient counseling includes setting appropriate expectations, reviewing the potential and anticipated risks of surgery, post-operative instruction to limit complications, and long-term follow-up. As thorough counseling is often a time-consuming endeavor, busy practices may elect to utilize various resources including educational materials, advanced practice providers, or group visits, among others. The consequences for poor patient selection and counseling may range from poor surgical outcomes and patient dissatisfaction to lawsuits, loss of credibility, or even significant patient or personal harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.