Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28904884›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2017

Circulating tumor cells and CDX models as a tool for preclinical drug development.

Alice Lallo, Maximilian W Schenk, Kristopher K Frese, Fiona Blackhall, Caroline Dive

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Circulating tumour cells in patients with lung cancer universally indicate poor prognosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advanced Microfluidics for Single Cell-Based Cancer Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The CRISPR/Cas System in Human Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Methods for the Detection of Circulating Biomarkers in Cancer Patients.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alice LalloClinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Maximilian W SchenkClinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kristopher K FreseClinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Fiona BlackhallInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Caroline DiveClinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19278Cancer Research UK 20465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancers are the main cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Efforts placed to improve the survival of lung cancer patients and untangle the complexity of this disease, have resulted in the generation of hundreds of lung cancer cell lines and several genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). Although these research tools have extended our knowledge of lung cancer, improvement in the clinical care of lung cancer patients have been limited overall, with measured optimism regarding initial responses to targeted therapies in stratified subgroups of patients. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are beginning to assist 'personalized therapy' approaches particularly in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) however biopsies of lung cancers to generate PDXs are not without challenges and risks to the patient. Liquid biopsies, on the other hand, are a rapid and non-invasive procedure allowing the collection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with a single 10 mL blood draw. These CTCs recapitulate the molecular heterogeneity of the corresponding tumors and, therefore, can be used as surrogates to study tumor biology and generate new patient-derived models. Here, we discuss the CTC-derived models that have been generated, most notably in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), highlighting challenges and opportunities related to these novel preclinical tools.

Indexed as

chemoresistancecirculating tumor cells (CTCs)drug screeningpreclinical modelSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Identifiers

PMID28904884
PMCPMC5583071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.