Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28904745›Full record

ArticleCell & bioscience2017

Genome editing of the HIV co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 by CRISPR-Cas9 protects CD4

Zhepeng Liu, Shuliang Chen, Xu Jin, Qiankun Wang, Kongxiang Yang, Chenlin Li, Qiaoqiao Xiao, Panpan Hou, Shuai Liu, Shaoshuai Wu and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell & bioscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Searching for a HIV-1 Cure.Theranostics · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. CRISPR/Cas9 Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. A CRISPR-Cas Cure for HIV/AIDS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhepeng Liu *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Shuliang Chen *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Xu JinGuangxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi People's Republic of China.
Qiankun WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Kongxiang YangCollege of Life Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Chenlin LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Qiaoqiao XiaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Panpan HouCollege of Life Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Shuai LiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Shaoshuai WuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Wei HouSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Yong XiongZhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Chunyan KongSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Xixian ZhaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Li WuCenter for Retrovirus Research, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Chunmei LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Guihong SunSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Deyin GuoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1760-6936
Wuhan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNGuangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main approach to treat HIV-1 infection is combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Although cART is effective in reducing HIV-1 viral load and controlling disease progression, it has many side effects, and is expensive for HIV-1 infected patients who must remain on lifetime treatment. HIV-1 gene therapy has drawn much attention as studies of genome editing tools have progressed. For example, zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), transcription activator like effector nucleases (TALEN) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 have been utilized to successfully disrupt the HIV-1 co-receptors CCR5 or CXCR4, thereby restricting HIV-1 infection. However, the effects of simultaneous genome editing of CXCR4 and CCR5 by CRISPR-Cas9 in blocking HIV-1 infection in primary CD4

resultsIn this report, we designed two different gRNA combinations targeting both CXCR4 and CCR5, in a single vector. The CRISPR-sgRNAs-Cas9 could successfully induce editing of CXCR4 and CCR5 genes in various cell lines and primary CD4

conclusionsOur results suggest that simultaneous genome editing of CXCR4 and CCR5 by CRISPR-Cas9 can potentially provide an effective and safe strategy towards a functional cure for HIV-1 infection.

Indexed as

AIDSCCR5 and CXCR4 simultaneousCRISPR-Cas9HIV-1

Identifiers

PMID28904745
PMCPMC5591563
OpenAlexW2753931614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.