ArticleStandards in genomic sciences2017
Complete genome sequence of the sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophic
Article in Standards in genomic sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host Shaping Associated Microbiota in Hydrothermal Vent Snails from the Indian Ocean Ridge.Biology · 2025Article
- Hydrogeological and geological partitioning of iron and sulfur cycling bacterial consortia in subsurface coal-based mine waters.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025Article
- ONature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- The bacterial sulfur cycle in expanding dysoxic and euxinic marine waters.Environmental microbiology · 2021Review
- High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a Potentially NovelMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Genomic Evidence for Formate Metabolism byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Parameters Governing the Community Structure and Element Turnover in Kermadec Volcanic Ash and Hydrothermal Fluids as Monitored by Inorganic Electron Donor Consumption, Autotrophic COFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophic bacterium,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.