ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2017
Reliability of patellar height indices in children with cerebral palsy and spina bifida.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anterior distal femoral hemiepiphysiodesis with and without patellar tendon shortening for fixed knee flexion contractures in children with cerebral palsy.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Koshino (KI) and Caton-Deschamps (CDI) indices are used to measure patellar height in children, with the CDI showing excellent reliability in typically developing (TD) children. Reliability of such measures in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and spina bifida (SB) is unknown.
methodsLateral knee radiographs were reviewed retrospectively for children with TD (n = 49), CP (n = 48) and SB (n = 42). Five raters took measurements from radiographs twice, at least two weeks apart. Measurements included the CDI, Insall-Salvati Index (ISI) and KI. Systematic variability (bias) and random variability were examined using repeated measures ANOVA, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and coefficients of variation (CV).
resultsMean values of all three indices differed among raters (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was seen between the first and second measurements for CDI and KI indicating a learning effect. LOA ranges were large for the CDI (intra-rater: 0.37-0.95, inter-rater: 0.60-1.04) and ISI (intra-rater: 0.25-0.49, inter-rater: 0.51-0.57) for all patient groups. The KI showed a clinically acceptable range for TD participants (intra-rater: 0.14-0.16, inter-rater: 0.11-0.14) with larger ranges for CP (intra-rater: 0.26-0.33, inter-rater 0.0.2-0.35) and SB patients (intra-rater: 0.23-0.27, inter-rater: 0.19-0.25). CVs were lowest (best) for KI (3.8% to 7.4%) and highest (worst) for CDI (14.7% to 23.1%) for all three groups. Results were similar for patients with both open and closed physes.
conclusionsThe KI is the most reliable patellar height measure for paediatric patients with TD, CP and SB, with either open or closed physes. The KI is more complex and experience may be important for valid, reliable measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.