Knockout of

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Rising from the fragments: a multi-factorial regulatory framework of DNA damage response in Deinococcus radiodurans.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2026
   Review
2. Development and Regulation of the Extreme Biofilm Formation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
   Article
3. iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans in response toBMC microbiology · 2022
   Article
4. Sequence, structure, and function of the Dps DNA-binding protein from Deinococcus wulumuqiensis R12.Microbial cell factories · 2022
   Article
5. The diversity and commonalities of the radiation-resistance mechanisms of Deinococcus and its up-to-date applications.AMB Express · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as