Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28904136›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Neural evidence supports a dual sensory-motor role for insect wings.

Brandon Pratt, Tanvi Deora, Thomas Mohren, Thomas Daniel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Receptogenesis in a Vascularized Robotic Embodiment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural dynamics and neural representation of wing deformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nonuniform structural properties of wings confer sensing advantages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Takeoff diversity in Diptera.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Precise timing is ubiquitous, consistent, and coordinated across a comprehensive, spike-resolved flight motor program.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brandon PrattDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Tanvi DeoraDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Thomas MohrenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Thomas DanielDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA danielt@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-1096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flying insects use feedback from various sensory modalities including vision and mechanosensation to navigate through their environment. The rapid speed of mechanosensory information acquisition and processing compensates for the slower processing times associated with vision, particularly under low light conditions. While halteres in dipteran species are well known to provide such information for flight control, less is understood about the mechanosensory roles of their evolutionary antecedent, wings. The features that wing mechanosensory neurons (campaniform sensilla) encode remains relatively unexplored. We hypothesized that the wing campaniform sensilla of the hawkmoth,

Indexed as

AnimalsFlight, AnimalManducaMechanoreceptorsSensillaWings, Animalcampaniform sensillaCoriolis forcesflight controlstrain sensingwings

Identifiers

PMID28904136
PMCPMC5597827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.