Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28904135›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Bird and bat species' global vulnerability to collision mortality at wind farms revealed through a trait-based assessment.

Chris B Thaxter, Graeme M Buchanan, Jamie Carr, Stuart H M Butchart, Tim Newbold, Rhys E Green, Joseph A Tobias, Wendy B Foden, Sue O'Brien, James W Pearce-Higgins

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Flight Altitude of Common Cranes (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reply to Pérez-García et al.: Perfect is the enemy of good.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chris B ThaxterBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK chris.thaxter@bto.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-4199
Graeme M BuchananRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, 2 Lochside View, Edinburgh Park, Edinburgh EH12 9DH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-8584
Jamie CarrInternational Union for Conservation of Nature, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.
Stuart H M ButchartBirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.
Tim NewboldCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-0051
Rhys E GreenConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-8914
Joseph A TobiasDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-6179
Wendy B FodenDepartment of Botany and Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, P/Bag X1, Matieland 7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8839-8740
Sue O'BrienJoint Nature Conservation Committee, Inverdee House, Baxter Street, Aberdeen AB11 9QA, UK.
James W Pearce-HigginsBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-5080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitigation of anthropogenic climate change involves deployments of renewable energy worldwide, including wind farms, which can pose a significant collision risk to volant animals. Most studies into the collision risk between species and wind turbines, however, have taken place in industrialized countries. Potential effects for many locations and species therefore remain unclear. To redress this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review of recorded collisions between birds and bats and wind turbines within developed countries. We related collision rate to species-level traits and turbine characteristics to quantify the potential vulnerability of 9538 bird and 888 bat species globally. Avian collision rate was affected by migratory strategy, dispersal distance and habitat associations, and bat collision rates were influenced by dispersal distance. For birds and bats, larger turbine capacity (megawatts) increased collision rates; however, deploying a smaller number of large turbines with greater energy output reduced total collision risk per unit energy output, although bat mortality increased again with the largest turbines. Areas with high concentrations of vulnerable species were also identified, including migration corridors. Our results can therefore guide wind farm design and location to reduce the risk of large-scale animal mortality. This is the first quantitative global assessment of the relative collision vulnerability of species groups with wind turbines, providing valuable guidance for minimizing potentially serious negative impacts on biodiversity.

Indexed as

BirdsChiropteraMortalityPower PlantsRenewable EnergyWindAnimal DistributionAnimal MigrationAnimalsClimate ChangeEcosystembiodiversityclimate changeimpactmeta-analysisphylogenyrenewable energy

Identifiers

PMID28904135
PMCPMC5597824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.