ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017
Comparison of three models of saccade disconjugacy in strabismus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, risk factors and clinical features of sensory A-V pattern exotropia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Disconjugacies of saccade duration and trajectories in strabismus.Strabismus · 2024Article
- Microstimulation of Interstitial Nucleus of Cajal Evokes Directionally Disconjugate Eye Movements in Monkeys With Pattern Strabismus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Decreased Functional Connectivity of the Primary Visual Cortex and the Correlation With Clinical Features in Patients With Intermittent Exotropia.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Abnormal Tuning in Nucleus Prepositus Hypoglossi of Monkeys With "A" Pattern Exotropia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Abnormal Eye Position Signals in Interstitial Nucleus of Cajal in Monkeys With "A" Pattern Strabismus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019Article
- Activity of near-response cells during disconjugate saccades in strabismic monkeys.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In pattern strabismus the horizontal and vertical misalignments vary with eye position along the orthogonal axis. The disorder is typically described in terms of overaction or underaction of oblique muscles. Recent behavioral studies in humans and monkeys, however, have reported that such actions are insufficient to fully explain the patterns of directional and amplitude disconjugacy of saccades. There is mounting evidence that the oculomotor abnormalities associated with strabismus are at least partially attributable to neurophysiological abnormalities. A number of control systems models have been developed to simulate the kinematic characteristics of saccades in normal primates. In the present study we sought to determine whether these models could simulate the abnormalities of saccades in strabismus by making two assumptions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.