Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28904064›Full record

ArticleCancer research2017

Structurally Novel Antiestrogens Elicit Differential Responses from Constitutively Active Mutant Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer Cells and Tumors.

Yuechao Zhao, Mary J Laws, Valeria Sanabria Guillen, Yvonne Ziegler, Jian Min, Abhishek Sharma, Sung Hoon Kim, David Chu, Ben Ho Park, Steffi Oesterreich and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuechao ZhaoDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Mary J LawsDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Valeria Sanabria GuillenDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Yvonne ZieglerDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Jian MinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Abhishek SharmaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Sung Hoon KimDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
David ChuDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ben Ho ParkDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Steffi OesterreichDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, Womens Cancer Research Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Chengjian MaoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
David J ShapiroDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Kendall W NettlesDepartment of Cancer Biology, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida.
John A KatzenellenbogenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Benita S KatzenellenbogenDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. katzenel@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USJohns Hopkins University · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Training Program in Cellular and Molecular MedicineT32GM008752 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, RAJINI · 2000 to 2019
$11.7M
MOLECULAR PROBES FOR STEROID RECEPTORSR37DK015556 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KATZENELLENBOGEN, JOHN A. · 1987 to 2012
$4.4M
Targeting Breast Cancer with Small Molecule Inhibitors of Estrogen ReceptorR01DK071909 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SHAPIRO, DAVID J · 2005 to 2020
$4.3M
Regulation of NFkappaB activity by the Estrogen ReceptorR01DK077085 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI NETTLES, KENDALL W · 2008 to 2012
$2.1M
Novel Ligands and Mechanisms to Achieve Selective Nuclear Receptor ActivityR01DK015556 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KATZENELLENBOGEN, JOHN A. · 1986 to 2016
$1.6M
Molecular Analysis of Steroid Hormone Receptors with X-ray CrystallographyR33CA132022 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI NETTLES, KENDALL W · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA132022NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK015556NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071909NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK077085NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK015556NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancers develop resistance to endocrine therapy via mutation of ERs whose constitutive activation is associated with shorter patient survival. Because there is now a clinical need for new antiestrogens (AE) against these mutant ERs, we describe here our development and characterization of three chemically novel AEs that effectively suppress proliferation of breast cancer cells and tumors. Our AEs are effective against wild-type and Y537S and D538G ERs, the two most commonly occurring constitutively active ERs. The three new AEs suppressed proliferation and estrogen target gene expression in WT and mutant ER-containing cells and were more effective in D538G than in Y537S cells and tumors. Compared with WT ER, mutants exhibited approximately 10- to 20-fold lower binding affinity for AE and a reduced ability to be blocked in coactivator interaction, likely contributing to their relative resistance to inhibition by AE. Comparisons between mutant ER-containing MCF7 and T47D cells revealed that AE responses were compound, cell-type, and ERα-mutant dependent. These new ligands have favorable pharmacokinetic properties and effectively suppressed growth of WT and mutant ER-expressing tumor xenografts in NOD/SCID-γ mice after oral or subcutaneous administration; D538G tumors were more potently inhibited by AE than Y537S tumors. These studies highlight the differential responsiveness of the mutant ERs to different AEs and make clear the value of having a toolkit of AEs for treatment of endocrine therapy-resistant tumors driven by different constitutively active ERs.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDRandom AllocationStructure-Activity RelationshipXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID28904064
PMCPMC5645250
OpenAlexW2753986479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.