Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28904061›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2017

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Green Tea Extract Supplementation and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Hamed Samavat, Giske Ursin, Tim H Emory, Eunjung Lee, Renwei Wang, Carolyn J Torkelson, Allison M Dostal, Karen Swenson, Chap T Le, Chung S Yang and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Exploration of plasma adiponectin, leptin, andJournal of nutritional science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Targets of Natural Compounds with Anti-Cancer Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. AhR and Cancer: From Gene Profiling to Targeted Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hamed SamavatDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Giske UrsinCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Tim H EmoryDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Eunjung LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Renwei WangDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carolyn J TorkelsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Allison M DostalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Karen SwensonVirginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Chap T LeDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Chung S YangDepartment of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Mimi C YuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Douglas YeeMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Anna H WuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Jian-Min YuanDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mindy S KurzerDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota. mkurzer@umn.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCancer Registry of Norway · NO

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
Green Tea and Reduction of Breast Cancer RiskR01CA127236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KURZER, MINDY SUSAN · 2008 to 2013
$5.7M
Translational Research Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA186873 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kathryn H. Schmitz, Jian-Min Yuan · 2014 to 2026
$2.7M
Training Program in Nutrition and CancerT32CA132670 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ANDERSON, KRISTIN ELLEN · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127236NCI NIH HHS T32 CA132670NCI NIH HHS T32 CA186873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiologic and animal studies suggest a protective role of green tea against breast cancer. However, the underlying mechanism is not understood. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial to investigate whether supplementation with green tea extract (GTE) modifies mammographic density (MD), as a potential mechanism, involving 1,075 healthy postmenopausal women. Women assigned to the treatment arm consumed daily 4 decaffeinated GTE capsules containing 1,315 mg total catechins, including 843 mg epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) for 12 months. A computer-assisted method (Madena) was used to assess MD in digital mammograms at baseline and month 12 time points in 932 completers (462 in GTE and 470 in placebo). GTE supplementation for 12 months did not significantly change percent MD (PMD) or absolute MD in all women. In younger women (50-55 years), GTE supplementation significantly reduced PMD by 4.40% as compared with the placebo with a 1.02% PMD increase from pre- to postintervention (

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgedAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntioxidantsBody Mass IndexBreastBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCatechinCatechol O-MethyltransferaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGenotypeHumansMammographyMiddle AgedAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntioxidantsCatechinCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanepigallocatechin gallatePlant ExtractsTamoxifenTea

Identifiers

PMID28904061
PMCPMC7337967
OpenAlexW2755197460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.