ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017
Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Fitness Tracker Information and Privacy Management: Empirical Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Operationalizing transparency regarding the use of health data for research: a cross-sectional survey of citizens' perspectives.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Health Data Sharing Among Patients With Somatic and Mental Health Diseases: Focus Group Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Developing a Data Trust Model (Not Only) for Sleep Research: Conceptual Study and Quantitative Survey.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Enhancing Large Language Models With AI Agents for Chronic Gastritis Management: Comprehensive Comparative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review.JMIR dermatology · 2025Review
- Frequency of Electronic Personal Health Record Use in US Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- The Role of Online Support, Caregiving, and Gender in Preventative Cancer Genetic Testing Participation: Cross-Sectional Study From a National Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Patterns of willingness to share health data with key stakeholders in US consumers: a latent class analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Digital Information Ecosystems in Modern Care Coordination and Patient Care Pathways and the Challenges and Opportunities for AI Solutions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- New Horizons for Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Article
- An experiment on data sharing options designs for eHealth interventions.Internet interventions · 2023Article
- Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Consumer perceptions on privacy and confidentiality in dermatology for 3D total-body imaging.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2023Article
- Policy Preferences Regarding Health Data Sharing Among Patients With Cancer: Public Deliberations.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- Perspectives on Privacy in the Post-Roe Era: A Mixed-Methods of Machine Learning and Qualitative Analyses of Tweets.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Perceptions, attitudes, and willingness of the public in low- and middle-income countries of the Arab region to participate in biobank research.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth care providers are driven by greater participation and systemic cost savings irrespective of benefits to individual patients derived from sharing Personal Health Information (PHI). Protecting PHI is a critical issue in the sharing of health care information systems; yet, there is very little literature examining the topic of sharing PHI electronically. A good overview of the regulatory, privacy, and societal barriers to sharing PHI can be found in the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act.
objectiveThis study investigated the factors that influence individuals' intentions to share their PHI electronically with health care providers, creating an understanding of how we can represent a patient's interests more accurately in sharing settings, instead of treating patients like predetermined subjects. Unlike privacy concern and trust, patient activation is a stable trait that is not subject to change in the short term and, thus, is a useful factor in predicting sharing behavior. We apply the extended privacy model in the health information sharing context and adapt this model to include patient activation and issue involvement to predict individuals' intentions.
methodsThis was a survey-based study with 1600+ participants using the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) data to validate a model through various statistical techniques. The research method included an assessment of both the measurement and structural models with post hoc analysis.
resultsWe find that privacy concern has the most influence on individuals' intentions to share. Patient activation, issue involvement, and patient-physician relationship are significant predictors of sharing intention. We contribute to theory by introducing patient activation and issue involvement as proxies for personal interest factors in the health care context.
conclusionsOverall, this study found that although patients are open to sharing their PHI, they still have concerns over the privacy of their PHI during the sharing process. It is paramount to address this factor to increase information flow and identify how patients can assure that their privacy is protected. The outcome of this study is a set of recommendations for motivating the sharing of PHI. The goal of this research is to increase the health profile of the patients by integrating the testing and diagnoses of various doctors across health care providers and, thus, bring patients closer to the physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.