Trial reportJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2017
Pharmacokinetics of a Transdermal Fentanyl Solution in Suffolk Sheep (
Trial report in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analgesia for Sheep in Commercial Production: Where to Next?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Transdermal Fentanyl Uptake at Two Different Patch Locations in Swiss White Alpine Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sheep used as surgical models require appropriate pain management, and the commonly used transdermal fentanyl patches require a long predosing period to achieve adequate plasma concentrations. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters of an FDA-approved transdermal fentanyl solution (TFS) that has yet to be tested in sheep. In this study, we compared TFS at 2.7 mg/kg (n = 2), 1.7 mg/kg (n = 3), and 0.5 mg/kg (n = 3) with the control fentanyl patch at 2 μg/kg/h (n = 1); both products were applied topically to the intrascapular region. Plasma concentrations showed significant interanimal variability. Severe adverse effects occurred at both 2.7 and 1.7 mg/kg TFS and mild to moderate adverse effects were noted at 0.5 mg/kg. At all 3 doses, TFS had greater maximal concentration, clearance rate, and volume of distribution; shorter time to maximal concentration; and similar half-lives to those of the patch. In addition, we validated the use of a commercial human fentanyl ELISA kit, which positively correlated with the liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy data, but absolute values did not match. Overall, at all 3 dosages tested (0.5, 1.7, and 2.7 mg/kg), TFS delivered fentanyl plasma concentrations that exceeded the minimal effective concentration; however, adverse effects were noted at all 3 dosages. Caution and further study are required before the use of TFS in sheep can be recommended fully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28903827PMC5605180W2768453121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.