Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28903824›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2017

Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Nalbuphine after Intraperitoneal and Subcutaneous Administration to C57BL/6 Mice.

Brenda L Kick, Pan Shu, Bo Wen, Duxin Sun, Douglas K Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda L KickDivision of Animal Resources, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;, Email: bkick@emory.edu.
Pan ShuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bo WenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Duxin SunDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Douglas K TaylorDivision of Animal Resources, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice undergo a variety of procedures that necessitate the use of analgesic agents. Opioids are often essential to successful pain management plans, but most are controlled substances, and their use requires appropriate federal and state registrations. Nalbuphine is a potentially effective opioid analgesic for mice that is not currently classified as a controlled substance. This compound has received little attention as an analgesic for mice, and standard dosage regimens have not been developed. Here we compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of 10 mg/kg nalbuphine in male C57BL/6 mice subcutaneous or intraperitoneal administration. Blood was collected from 3 mice per treatment at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after administration. Plasma concentrations were measured, and standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Profile characteristics for each route of administration were similar, with significant differences in plasma concentration at 5 and 30 min and 1 and 3 h. Nalbuphine was absorbed more quickly when administered subcutaneously (Tmax, 5 min) than intraperitoneally (Tmax, 10 min), whereas the drug's half-life was similar between the intraperitoneal (0.94 h) and subcutaneous (1.12 h) routes. The AUC0-tldc and AUC0-inf were higher but the apparent clearance and apparent volume of distribution were lower after subcutaneous administration compared with intraperitoneal dosing. Plasma concentrations were below the level of detection by 12 h. These results suggest that nalbuphine is absorbed in and eliminated quickly from mice, making it a possible candidate for acute pain management.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryHalf-LifeHumansInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNalbuphinePainAnalgesics, OpioidNalbuphine

Identifiers

PMID28903824
PMCPMC5605177
OpenAlexW2782064791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.