Trial reportJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2017
Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Nalbuphine after Intraperitoneal and Subcutaneous Administration to C57BL/6 Mice.
Trial report in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperlipidemia Increases Nalbuphine Brain Accumulation with Multiple Dosing without Affecting Its Analgesic Response-Its Respiratory Depression Potential Should Be Investigated in Future Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Review of Strain and Sex Differences in Response to Pain and Analgesia in Mice.Comparative medicine · 2019Review
- Co-Administration of nalbuphine to improve morphine tolerance in mice with bone cancer pain.Molecular painArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mice undergo a variety of procedures that necessitate the use of analgesic agents. Opioids are often essential to successful pain management plans, but most are controlled substances, and their use requires appropriate federal and state registrations. Nalbuphine is a potentially effective opioid analgesic for mice that is not currently classified as a controlled substance. This compound has received little attention as an analgesic for mice, and standard dosage regimens have not been developed. Here we compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of 10 mg/kg nalbuphine in male C57BL/6 mice subcutaneous or intraperitoneal administration. Blood was collected from 3 mice per treatment at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after administration. Plasma concentrations were measured, and standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Profile characteristics for each route of administration were similar, with significant differences in plasma concentration at 5 and 30 min and 1 and 3 h. Nalbuphine was absorbed more quickly when administered subcutaneously (Tmax, 5 min) than intraperitoneally (Tmax, 10 min), whereas the drug's half-life was similar between the intraperitoneal (0.94 h) and subcutaneous (1.12 h) routes. The AUC0-tldc and AUC0-inf were higher but the apparent clearance and apparent volume of distribution were lower after subcutaneous administration compared with intraperitoneal dosing. Plasma concentrations were below the level of detection by 12 h. These results suggest that nalbuphine is absorbed in and eliminated quickly from mice, making it a possible candidate for acute pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28903824PMC5605177W2782064791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.