Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28903777›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2017

Modest heterologous protection after Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite immunization: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Jona Walk, Isaie J Reuling, Marije C Behet, Lisette Meerstein-Kessel, Wouter Graumans, Geert-Jan van Gemert, Rianne Siebelink-Stoter, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer, Thorsten Janssen, Karina Teelen and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02098590 (Chemoprophylaxis and Plasmodium Falciparum NF54 Sporozoite Immunization Challenged by Heterologous Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02098590 nacompletednot on this map

Chemoprophylaxis and Plasmodium Falciparum NF54 Sporozoite Immunization Challenged by Heterologous Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2014 to 2015Enrolled40ConditionsMalariaArmsCPS-immunization, malaria challenge infection, P. falciparum NF135.C10, malaria challenge infection, P. falciparum NF166.C8, malaria challenge infection, P. falciparum NF54, atovaquone/proguanil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Chemoprophylaxis Vaccination: Phase I Study to Explore Stage-specific Immunity to Plasmodium falciparum in US Adults.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Controlled Human Malaria Infection with Graded Numbers ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Malaria: past, present, and future.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Controlled Human Malaria Infection Studies in Africa-Past, Present, and Future.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  17. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jona WalkDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Isaie J ReulingDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marije C BehetDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lisette Meerstein-KesselDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter GraumansDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan van GemertDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rianne Siebelink-StoterDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marga van de Vegte-BolmerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thorsten JanssenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karina TeelenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes H W de WiltDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Surgery 618, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Quirijn de MastDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Internal Medicine 456, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
André J van der VenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Internal Medicine 456, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ernest Diez BenaventeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Susana CampinoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Taane G ClarkLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Martijn A HuynenRadboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences and Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, CMBI 260, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelus C HermsenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Else M BijkerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anja ScholzenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert W SauerweinDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 28, Microbiology 268, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. robert.sauerwein@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA highly efficacious vaccine is needed for malaria control and eradication. Immunization with Plasmodium falciparum NF54 parasites under chemoprophylaxis (chemoprophylaxis and sporozoite (CPS)-immunization) induces the most efficient long-lasting protection against a homologous parasite. However, parasite genetic diversity is a major hurdle for protection against heterologous strains.

methodsWe conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 39 healthy participants of NF54-CPS immunization by bites of 45 NF54-infected (n = 24 volunteers) or uninfected mosquitoes (placebo; n = 15 volunteers) against a controlled human malaria infection with the homologous NF54 or the genetically distinct NF135.C10 and NF166.C8 clones. Cellular and humoral immune assays were performed as well as genetic characterization of the parasite clones.

resultsNF54-CPS immunization induced complete protection in 5/5 volunteers against NF54 challenge infection at 14 weeks post-immunization, but sterilely protected only 2/10 and 1/9 volunteers against NF135.C10 and NF166.C8 challenge infection, respectively. Post-immunization plasma showed a significantly lower capacity to block heterologous parasite development in primary human hepatocytes compared to NF54. Whole genome sequencing showed that NF135.C10 and NF166.C8 have amino acid changes in multiple antigens targeted by CPS-induced antibodies. Volunteers protected against heterologous challenge were among the stronger immune responders to in vitro parasite stimulation.

conclusionsAlthough highly protective against homologous parasites, NF54-CPS-induced immunity is less effective against heterologous parasite clones both in vivo and in vitro. Our data indicate that whole sporozoite-based vaccine approaches require more potent immune responses for heterologous protection.

trial registrationThis trial is registered in clinicaltrials.gov, under identifier NCT02098590 .

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansImmunizationMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumSporozoitesYoung AdultMalaria VaccinesControlled human malaria infectionHeterologous protectionImmune responsesMalariaPlasmodium falciparumSporozoiteVaccine

Identifiers

PMID28903777
PMCPMC5598044
OpenAlexW2754855881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.