Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28903771›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

Novel spatiotemporal analysis of gait changes in body weight supported treadmill trained rats following cervical spinal cord injury.

Nathan D Neckel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan D NeckelDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, NW, 20007, USA. Nathan.Neckel@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN RECOVERY OF FUNCTION AFTER CNS INJURYT32HD007459 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BREGMAN, BARBARA S · 1994 to 2008
$2.3M
Spinal cord injury: plasticity and recovery of functionR01NS051656 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BREGMAN, BARBARA S · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
Asymmetric robotic gait training and asymmetric reaching training to induce bothR00HD067339 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI NECKEL, NATHAN DANIEL · 2014 to 2016
$723k
Asymmetric robotic gait training and asymmetric reaching training to induce bothK99HD067339 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI NECKEL, NATHAN DANIEL · 2012 to 2013
$173k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD067339NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD067339NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007459NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommon gait measures such as stride length, cycle time, and step height are not independent variables, but different aspects of the same multidimensional step. This complicates comparisons between experimental groups. Here we present a novel multidimensional gait analysis method and use this method to assess the ability of body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) to improve rodent stepping after spinal cord injury (SCI).

methodsIn lieu of reducing a step to a collection of gait measures and comparing the means of several of these, we developed a multidimensional analysis technique that compares the step as a whole. While in a passive robotic gait training device, the pre-injury hindlimb stepping of 108 rats was recorded while they walked in a quadrupedal posture at 8 cm/s. Following a C4/5 over-hemisection spinal cord injury the weekly changes in stepping were tracked for 17 untrained and 10 BWSTT animals for 7 weeks. The performance of trained rats was recorded during training with BWS, as well as at the end of the training week without BWS. An additional six uninjured rats were trained for 5 weeks.

resultsOur novel multidimensional analysis shows that stepping is asymmetrically altered 1 week after SCI. The differences in stepping change over the following weeks, with the less impaired left hindlimb deviating further away from pre-injury than the more impaired right hindlimb. Uninjured rats do not significantly alter their stepping over 5 weeks. BWSTT improves the stepping of the right hindlimb, but only when the BWS is active. If the BWS is not present, the performance of trained animals is worse than untrained rats. The left hindlimb performance of BWSTT rats is worse than untrained rats, during both training sessions and weekly assessments.

conclusionsWe feel that our novel multidimensional analysis is a more appropriate method to address the inter-dependencies of gait measures. Untrained rats exhibit both initial impairments as well as the development of compensatory techniques. BWSTT does not improve this spontaneous recovery, but exacerbates it, particularly in the less impaired left hindlimb.

Indexed as

Body WeightGaitAnimalsCervical CordFemaleFunctional LateralityHindlimbLameness, AnimalModels, NeurologicalPhysical Conditioning, AnimalPostureRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRoboticsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID28903771
PMCPMC5598057
OpenAlexW2755657688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.