ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2017
The road from development to approval: evaluating the body of evidence to confirm biosimilarity.
Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging approaches to facilitate innovation: building an approach for heated tobacco products from case studies in the food and drug domains a comparative review.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- An Overview of Biosimilars-Development, Quality, Regulatory Issues, and Management in Healthcare.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Navigating adalimumab biosimilars: an expert opinion.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Review
- Understanding Biosimilar Insulins - Development, Manufacturing, and Clinical Trials.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Review
- Comparison of Biosimilar Trastuzumab ABP 980 with Reference Trastuzumab in Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer - an Analysis of a Large University Breast Cancer Centre.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2023Article
- An Introduction to Biosimilars for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Review
- Biosimilars for the treatment of patients with psoriasis: A consensus statement from the Biosimilar Working Group of the International Psoriasis Council.JAAD international · 2020Article
- The Future of Biosimilars: Maximizing Benefits Across Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.Drugs · 2020Review
- Real-life Tolerability and Effectiveness of Adalimumab Biosimilar in Ankylosing Spondylitis: the Adalimumab Biosimilar Patient Registry Data.ACR open rheumatology · 2019Article
- Real-Life Tolerability and Effectiveness of Adalimumab Biosimilar in Rheumatoid Arthritis: ASPIRE Registry Data.Rheumatology and therapy · 2019Article
- The arrival of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in oncology: clinical studies for trastuzumab biosimilars.British journal of cancer · 2019Review
- Addressing unmet clinical needs: the potential of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- The process defines the product: what really matters in biosimilar design and production?Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosimilars are products that contain a similar version of the active substance of an already authorized original biologic medicinal product (reference medicinal product). Their development requires special consideration, as similarity to the reference agent needs to be established through a comprehensive comparability exercise. Given the complex nature of these agents, minor structural differences may emerge, but the process of biosimilarity determination is designed to ascertain that the nature and impact of these differences are not clinically significant. Determination of biosimilarity should follow quality-by-design principles, which provide a deep understanding of the product development process, guided by pre-defined objectives, process control and risk management. Compared with novel biologic development, biosimilar development places greater emphasis on establishing preclinical quality characteristics. Determination of comparability of quality characteristics includes assessment of physicochemical properties, biological activity, immunochemical properties, purity, impurity and quantity, with appropriate in vivo pharmacology studies being conducted thereafter. Head-to-head comparisons are then conducted to determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, and efficacy, safety and tolerability in phase I and phase III clinical studies. Post-approval risk management requirements include implementation of pharmacovigilance systems and risk management through, for example, the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies. There are several biosimilars used in the field of rheumatology that are available in the European Union, or in development, that offer the potential to increase affordability/accessibility of biological treatment. The role of these agents in rheumatology will be determined by the confidence placed in them by rheumatologists. These prescribers should expect high-quality data evaluated by an extensive assessment process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.