Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28903476›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2017

Adenoviral intramyocardial VEGF-DΔNΔC gene transfer increases myocardial perfusion reserve in refractory angina patients: a phase I/IIa study with 1-year follow-up.

Juha Hartikainen, Iiro Hassinen, Antti Hedman, Antti Kivelä, Antti Saraste, Juhani Knuuti, Minna Husso, Hanna Mussalo, Marja Hedman, Tuomas T Rissanen and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Angiogenic Doping: Plausible Yet Difficult to Detect.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Gene Therapy for Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Gene therapy then and now: A look back at changes in the field over the past 25 years.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gene therapy for atrial fibrillation.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cardioprotection in cardiovascular surgery.Basic research in cardiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Lymphangiogenesis: A new strategy for heart disease treatment (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Juha HartikainenHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Iiro HassinenHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Antti HedmanHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Antti KiveläHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Antti SarasteTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku 20521, Finland.
Juhani KnuutiTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku 20521, Finland.
Minna HussoCenter of Diagnostic Imaging, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Hanna MussaloCenter of Diagnostic Imaging, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Marja HedmanHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Tuomas T RissanenHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Pyry ToivanenA.I. Virtanen Institute, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio 70211, Finland.
Tommi HeikuraA.I. Virtanen Institute, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio 70211, Finland.
Joseph L WitztumUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Sotirios TsimikasUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Seppo Ylä-HerttualaHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio 70029, Finland.
Kuopio University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of California, San Diego · USNorth Karelia Central Hospital · FITurku PET Centre · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe evaluated for the first time the effects of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic AdVEGF-DΔNΔC gene therapy in patients with refractory angina. METHODS AND

resultsThirty patients were randomized to AdVEGF-DΔNΔC (AdVEGF-D) or placebo (control) groups. Electromechanical NOGA mapping and radiowater PET were used to identify hibernating viable myocardium where treatment was targeted. Safety, severity of symptoms, quality of life, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and routine clinical chemistry were measured. Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was assessed with radiowater PET at baseline and after 3- and 12-months follow-up. Treatment was well tolerated. Myocardial perfusion reserve increased significantly in the treated area in the AdVEGF-D group compared with baseline (1.00 ± 0.36) at 3 months (1.31 ± 0.46, P = 0.045) and 12 months (1.44 ± 0.48, P = 0.009) whereas MPR in the reference area tended to decrease (2.05 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 0.62, and 1.87 ± 0.69; baseline, 3 and 12 months, respectively, P = 0.551). Myocardial perfusion reserve in the control group showed no significant change from baseline to 3 and 12 months (1.26 ± 0.37, 1.57 ± 0.55, and 1.48 ± 0.48; respectively, P = 0.690). No major changes were found in clinical chemistry but anti-adenovirus antibodies increased in 54% of the treated patients compared with baseline. AdVEGF-D patients in the highest Lp(a) tertile at baseline showed the best response to therapy (MPR 0.94 ± 0.32 and 1.76 ± 0.41 baseline and 12 months, respectively, P = 0.023).

conclusionAdVEGF-DΔNΔC gene therapy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Myocardial perfusion increased at 1 year in the treated areas with impaired MPR at baseline. Plasma Lp(a) may be a potential biomarker to identify patients that may have the greatest benefit with this therapy.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAgedAngina PectorisFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMaleMyocardial Perfusion ImagingNeovascularization, PhysiologicQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DAngiogenesisGene therapyLymphangiogenesisPETSafetyTherapeutic angiogenesis

Identifiers

PMID28903476
PMCPMC5837555
OpenAlexW2741933191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.