Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28903049›Full record

ArticleCell reports2017

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach for Mapping Protein Subcellular Localization Reveals the Spatial Proteome of Mouse Primary Neurons.

Daniel N Itzhak, Colin Davies, Stefka Tyanova, Archana Mishra, James Williamson, Robin Antrobus, Jürgen Cox, Michael P Weekes, Georg H H Borner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of Yeast Peroxisomes via Spatial Proteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel N ItzhakDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Colin DaviesCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Stefka TyanovaDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Archana MishraDepartment of Molecules-Signaling-Development, Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
James WilliamsonCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Robin AntrobusCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Jürgen CoxDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Michael P WeekesCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Georg H H BornerDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany. Electronic address: borner@biochem.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously developed a mass spectrometry-based method, dynamic organellar maps, for the determination of protein subcellular localization and identification of translocation events in comparative experiments. The use of metabolic labeling for quantification (stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture [SILAC]) renders the method best suited to cells grown in culture. Here, we have adapted the workflow to both label-free quantification (LFQ) and chemical labeling/multiplexing strategies (tandem mass tagging [TMT]). Both methods are highly effective for the generation of organellar maps and capture of protein translocations. Furthermore, application of label-free organellar mapping to acutely isolated mouse primary neurons provided subcellular localization and copy-number information for over 8,000 proteins, allowing a detailed analysis of organellar organization. Our study extends the scope of dynamic organellar maps to any cell type or tissue and also to high-throughput screening.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell FractionationCells, CulturedHeLa CellsHumansIsotope LabelingMiceNeuronsOrganellesProtein TransportProteomeProteomicsStaining and LabelingSubcellular FractionsTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersProteomeEGF signalinglabel-free quantificationLFQneuronsorganellar proteomicsprimary cellsquantitative mass spectrometryspatial proteomicstandem mass taggingTMT

Identifiers

PMID28903049
PMCPMC5775508
OpenAlexW2755992008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.