Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28902868›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Discovery of numerous novel small genes in the intergenic regions of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 Sakai genome.

Sarah M Hücker, Zachary Ardern, Tatyana Goldberg, Andrea Schafferhans, Michael Bernhofer, Gisle Vestergaard, Chase W Nelson, Michael Schloter, Burkhard Rost, Siegfried Scherer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Cryptic Bacterial Microproteome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding small ORF diversity through a comprehensive transcription feature classification.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Are Antisense Proteins in Prokaryotes Functional?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah M HückerChair for Microbial Ecology, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Zachary ArdernChair for Microbial Ecology, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Tatyana GoldbergDepartment of Informatics-Bioinformatics & TUM-IAS, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Andrea SchafferhansDepartment of Informatics-Bioinformatics & TUM-IAS, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Michael BernhoferDepartment of Informatics-Bioinformatics & TUM-IAS, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Gisle VestergaardResearch Unit Environmental Genomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Chase W NelsonSackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History New York, New York, United States of America.
Michael SchloterResearch Unit Environmental Genomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Burkhard RostDepartment of Informatics-Bioinformatics & TUM-IAS, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Siegfried SchererChair for Microbial Ecology, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Klaus NeuhausChair for Microbial Ecology, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-2814
Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich · DETechnical University of Munich · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEAmerican Museum of Natural History · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past, short protein-coding genes were often disregarded by genome annotation pipelines. Transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) signals outside of annotated genes have usually been interpreted to indicate either ncRNA or pervasive transcription. Therefore, in addition to the transcriptome, the translatome (RIBOseq) of the enteric pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain Sakai was determined at two optimal growth conditions and a severe stress condition combining low temperature and high osmotic pressure. All intergenic open reading frames potentially encoding a protein of ≥ 30 amino acids were investigated with regard to coverage by transcription and translation signals and their translatability expressed by the ribosomal coverage value. This led to discovery of 465 unique, putative novel genes not yet annotated in this E. coli strain, which are evenly distributed over both DNA strands of the genome. For 255 of the novel genes, annotated homologs in other bacteria were found, and a machine-learning algorithm, trained on small protein-coding E. coli genes, predicted that 89% of these translated open reading frames represent bona fide genes. The remaining 210 putative novel genes without annotated homologs were compared to the 255 novel genes with homologs and to 250 short annotated genes of this E. coli strain. All three groups turned out to be similar with respect to their translatability distribution, fractions of differentially regulated genes, secondary structure composition, and the distribution of evolutionary constraint, suggesting that both novel groups represent legitimate genes. However, the machine-learning algorithm only recognized a small fraction of the 210 genes without annotated homologs. It is possible that these genes represent a novel group of genes, which have unusual features dissimilar to the genes of the machine-learning algorithm training set.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialGenome, BacterialConserved SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA, IntergenicEscherichia coli O157Genetic Association StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOpen Reading FramesRNA, BacterialTranscriptomeDNA, BacterialDNA, IntergenicRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID28902868
PMCPMC5597208
OpenAlexW2755513239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.