Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28902858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Modeling the spatial distribution of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa.

Kristen Hughes, Geoffrey T Fosgate, Christine M Budke, Michael P Ward, Ruth Kerry, Ben Ingram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epidemiology ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristen HughesDepartment of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Geoffrey T FosgateDepartment of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-0042
Christine M BudkeVeterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Michael P WardFaculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camden, Australia.
Ruth KerryDepartment of Geography, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Ben IngramFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Talca, Curicó, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The population density of wildlife reservoirs contributes to disease transmission risk for domestic animals. The objective of this study was to model the African buffalo distribution of the Kruger National Park. A secondary objective was to collect field data to evaluate models and determine environmental predictors of buffalo detection. Spatial distribution models were created using buffalo census information and archived data from previous research. Field data were collected during the dry (August 2012) and wet (January 2013) seasons using a random walk design. The fit of the prediction models were assessed descriptively and formally by calculating the root mean square error (rMSE) of deviations from field observations. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of environmental variables on the detection of buffalo herds and linear regression was used to identify predictors of larger herd sizes. A zero-inflated Poisson model produced distributions that were most consistent with expected buffalo behavior. Field data confirmed that environmental factors including season (P = 0.008), vegetation type (P = 0.002), and vegetation density (P = 0.010) were significant predictors of buffalo detection. Bachelor herds were more likely to be detected in dense vegetation (P = 0.005) and during the wet season (P = 0.022) compared to the larger mixed-sex herds. Static distribution models for African buffalo can produce biologically reasonable results but environmental factors have significant effects and therefore could be used to improve model performance. Accurate distribution models are critical for the evaluation of disease risk and to model disease transmission.

Indexed as

BuffaloesDemographyParks, RecreationalAnimal DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildModels, StatisticalPopulation DensitySeasonsSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID28902858
PMCPMC5597095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.