Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28902836›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors.

A C Penn, C L Zhang, F Georges, L Royer, C Breillat, E Hosy, J D Petersen, Y Humeau, D Choquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Activity-Dependent Increases in Quantal Size at theJournal of developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Signaling by intracellular βCell reports · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The effect of traumatic brain injury on learning and memory: A synaptic focus.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  16. Large Donor CRISPR for Whole-Coding Sequence Replacement of Cell Adhesion Molecule LRRTM2.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Understanding the molecular diversity of synapses.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A C PennUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
C L ZhangUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
F GeorgesUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
L RoyerUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
C BreillatUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
E HosyUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
J D PetersenUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Y HumeauUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
D ChoquetUniversity of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M020746/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) of excitatory synaptic transmission has long been considered a cellular correlate for learning and memory. Early LTP (less than 1 h) had initially been explained either by presynaptic increases in glutamate release or by direct modification of postsynaptic AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) receptor function. Compelling models have more recently proposed that synaptic potentiation can occur by the recruitment of additional postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs), sourced either from an intracellular reserve pool by exocytosis or from nearby extra-synaptic receptors pre-existing on the neuronal surface. However, the exact mechanism through which synapses can rapidly recruit new AMPARs during early LTP remains unknown. In particular, direct evidence for a pivotal role of AMPAR surface diffusion as a trafficking mechanism in synaptic plasticity is still lacking. Here, using AMPAR immobilization approaches, we show that interfering with AMPAR surface diffusion markedly impairs synaptic potentiation of Schaffer collaterals and commissural inputs to the CA1 area of the mouse hippocampus in cultured slices, acute slices and in vivo. Our data also identify distinct contributions of various AMPAR trafficking routes to the temporal profile of synaptic potentiation. In addition, AMPAR immobilization in vivo in the dorsal hippocampus inhibited fear conditioning, indicating that AMPAR diffusion is important for the early phase of contextual learning. Therefore, our results provide a direct demonstration that the recruitment of new receptors to synapses by surface diffusion is a critical mechanism for the expression of LTP and hippocampal learning. Since AMPAR surface diffusion is dictated by weak Brownian forces that are readily perturbed by protein-protein interactions, we anticipate that this fundamental trafficking mechanism will be a key target for modulating synaptic potentiation and learning.

Indexed as

DiffusionAnimalsAvidinBiotinCell MembraneConditioning, ClassicalCross-Linking ReagentsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFearFemaleHippocampusImmunoglobulin GLong-Term PotentiationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAvidinBiotinCross-Linking ReagentsImmunoglobulin GReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID28902836
PMCPMC5683353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.