Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28902785›Full record

ArticlePancreas2017

Predictors of Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Weight Loss and Nutritional Interventions.

Laura Nemer, Somashekar G Krishna, Zarine K Shah, Darwin L Conwell, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, Mary Dillhoff, Denis C Guttridge, Alice Hinton, Andrei Manilchuk, Timothy M Pawlik and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pancreas, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient-reported use of pancreatic enzyme replacement treatment (PERT) in pancreatic cancer in New Zealand and Australia: a cross-sectional survey study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura NemerFrom the *Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, †Department of Radiology, ‡Division of Surgical Oncology, §Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, ∥Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, ¶Division of General Surgery, #Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH; and **Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Somashekar G Krishna
Zarine K Shah
Darwin L Conwell
Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate
Mary Dillhoff
Denis C Guttridge
Alice Hinton
Andrei Manilchuk
Timothy M Pawlik
Carl R Schmidt
Erin E Talbert
Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Phil A Hart
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
The Ohio State University Pancreatic Disorders Network (OSU-PDN)U01DK108327 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONWELL, DARWIN LEWIS, HART, PHILIP A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often accompanied by weight loss. We sought to characterize factors associated with weight loss and observed nutritional interventions, as well as define the effect of weight loss on survival.

methodsConsecutive subjects diagnosed with PDAC (N = 123) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate analysis was used to compare subjects with and without substantial (>5%) weight loss. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with weight loss, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox survival models.

resultsSubstantial weight loss at diagnosis was present in 71.5% of subjects and was independently associated with higher baseline body mass index, longer symptom duration, and increased tumor size. Recommendations for nutrition consultation and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy occurred in 27.6% and 36.9% of subjects, respectively. Weight loss (>5%) was not associated with worse survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-2.30), unless a higher threshold (>10%) was used (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.87).

conclusionsDespite the high prevalence of weight loss at PDAC diagnosis, there are low observed rates of nutritional interventions. Weight loss based on current criteria for cancer cachexia is not associated with poor survival in PDAC.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAgedBody Mass IndexCachexiaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNutrition TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28902785
PMCPMC5679236
OpenAlexW2755616372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.