Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28902295›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2017

Sandfly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an urban area, Central-West of Brazil.

Wagner de Souza Fernandes, Leandro Machado Borges, Aline Etelvina Casaril, Everton Falcão de Oliveira, Jucelei de Oliveira Moura Infran, Eliane Mattos Piranda, Elisa Teruya Oshiro, Suellem Petilim Gomes, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wagner de Souza FernandesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Leandro Machado BorgesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Aline Etelvina CasarilUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Everton Falcão de OliveiraUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Engenharia/Estatística, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jucelei de Oliveira Moura InfranUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Laboratório de Parasitologia Humana, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Eliane Mattos PirandaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Laboratório de Parasitologia Humana, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Elisa Teruya OshiroUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Laboratório de Parasitologia Humana, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Suellem Petilim GomesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Alessandra Gutierrez de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological and ecological relations among vectors and their pathogens are important to understand the epidemiology of vector-borne diseases. Camapuã is an endemic area for visceral and tegumentary leishmaniasis. The aim of this study was to characterize the sandfly fauna present in Camapuã , MS, Brazil. Sand flies were collected every fortnight from May 2014 to April 2015 using automatic light traps in the domicile and peridomicile of twelve neighborhoods and forest. The collected specimens were identified based on morphology according to the valid identification keys. In total, 2005 sandflies of five genera and nine species were collected. Nyssomyia whitmani and Lutzomyia cruzi were the most abundant species. Males were more abundant, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.14. The highest diversity was observed in peripheral neighborhood, with abundant plant cover. The peridomicile presented greater abundance of sandflies, with the predominance of Ny. whitmani . No significant correlation between the absolute frequencies of the most abundant species and the precipitation variable was observed; however, there was a predominance of Lu. cruzi in the rainy season. We observed a high frequency of sandflies in urban area, especially vector species. The presence of Nyssomyia whitmani and Lutzomyia cruzi indicate the necessity for health surveillance in the municipality. Additional method of collection such as sticky trap is also recommended for appropriate faunestic study.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrazilFemaleInsect VectorsLeishmaniasis, VisceralMalePopulation DensityPsychodidaeSeasonsSex RatioUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID28902295
PMCPMC5574625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.