Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28901625›Full record

ArticleBipolar disorders2017

Systemic challenges in bipolar disorder management: A patient-centered approach.

Anastasiya Nestsiarovich, Nathaniel G Hurwitz, Stuart J Nelson, Annette S Crisanti, Berit Kerner, Matt J Kuntz, Alicia N Smith, Emma Volesky, Quentin L Schroeter, Jason L DeShaw and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bipolar disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02893371 (Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02893371 terminatednot on this map

Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,037,352ConditionsBipolar DisorderArmsLithium Carbonate, Lamotrigine, Valproic Acid, Oxcarbazepine, Carbamazepine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. European Psychiatric Association policy paper on ethical aspects in communication with patients and their families.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Anastasiya NestsiarovichCenter for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-2381
Nathaniel G HurwitzNew Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, Las Vegas, NM, USA.
Stuart J NelsonUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Annette S CrisantiDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Berit KernerSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matt J KuntzNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MN, USA.
Alicia N SmithNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MN, USA.
Emma VoleskyNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MN, USA.
Quentin L SchroeterNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MN, USA.
Jason L DeShawNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MN, USA.
S Stanley YoungCGStat, LLC, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Robert L ObenchainRisk Benefit Statistics, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ronald L KrallUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kimmie JordanNational Alliance on Mental Illness New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Jan FawcettDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Mauricio TohenDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8049-4351
Douglas J PerkinsCenter for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Christophe G LambertCenter for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1994-2893
National Alliance on Mental Illness · USUniversity of New Mexico · USNew Mexico Department of Health · USNew Mexico Highlands University · USNorth Carolina Space Grant Consortium · USRisk Engineering (Bulgaria) · BGUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs part of a series of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded large-scale retrospective observational studies on bipolar disorder (BD) treatments and outcomes, we sought the input of patients with BD and their family members to develop research questions. We aimed to identify systemic root causes of patient-reported challenges with BD management in order to guide subsequent studies and initiatives.

methodsThree focus groups were conducted where patients and their family members (total n = 34) formulated questions around the central theme, "What do you wish you had known in advance or over the course of treatment for BD?" In an affinity mapping exercise, participants clustered their questions and ranked the resulting categories by importance. The research team and members of our patient partner advisory council further rated the questions by expected impact on patients. Using a Theory of Constraints systems thinking approach, several causal models of BD management challenges and their potential solution were developed with patients using the focus group data.

resultsA total of 369 research questions were mapped to 33 categories revealing 10 broad themes. The top priorities for patient stakeholders involved pharmacotherapy and treatment alternatives. Analysis of causal relationships underlying 47 patient concerns revealed two core conflicts: for patients, whether or not to take pharmacotherapy, and for mental health services, the dilemma of care quality vs quantity.

conclusionsTo alleviate the core conflicts identified, BD management requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach including: improved access to mental health services, objective diagnostics, sufficient provider visit time, evidence-based individualized treatment, and psychosocial support.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderAdultCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPatient PreferenceQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesbipolar disorderoperational excellencepatient-centeredpatient prioritiessystems thinkingTheory of Constraints

Identifiers

PMID28901625
PMCPMC5763323
OpenAlexW2755651923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.