Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28901514›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2017

Multimodal actions of the phytochemical sulforaphane suppress both AR and AR-V7 in 22Rv1 cells: Advocating a potent pharmaceutical combination against castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Namrata Khurana, Hogyoung Kim, Partha K Chandra, Sudha Talwar, Pankaj Sharma, Asim B Abdel-Mageed, Suresh C Sikka, Debasis Mondal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The crosstalk between ubiquitination and endocrine therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Namrata KhuranaDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Hogyoung KimDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Partha K ChandraDepartment of Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Sudha TalwarDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Pankaj SharmaAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201313, India.
Asim B Abdel-MageedDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Suresh C SikkaDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Debasis MondalDepartment of Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Tulane University · USAmity University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) cells expressing full-length androgen receptor (AR-FL) are susceptible to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, outgrowth of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) can occur due to the expression of constitutively active (ligand-independent) AR splice variants, particularly AR-V7. We previously demonstrated that sulforaphane (SFN), an isothiocyanate phytochemical, can decrease AR-FL levels in the PCa cell lines, LNCaP and C4-2B. Here, we examined the efficacy of SFN in targeting both AR-FL and AR-V7 in the CRPC cell line, CWR22Rv1 (22Rv1). MTT cell viability, wound-heal assay, and colony forming unit (CFU) measurements revealed that 22Rv1 cells are resistant to the anti-androgen, enzalutamide (ENZ). However, co-exposure to SFN sensitized these cells to the potent anticancer effects of ENZ (P<0.05). Immunoblot analyses showed that SFN (5-20 µM) rapidly decreases both AR-FL and AR-V7 levels, and immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) depicted decreased AR in both cytoplasm and nucleus with SFN treatment. SFN increased both ubiquitination and proteasomal activity in 22Rv1 cells. Studies using a protein synthesis inhibitor (cycloheximide) or a proteasomal inhibitor (MG132) indicated that SFN increases both ubiquitin-mediated aggregation and subsequent proteasomal-degradation of AR proteins. Previous studies reported that SFN inhibits the chaperone activity of heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and induces the nuclear factor erythroid-2-like 2 (Nrf2) transcription factor. Therefore, we investigated whether the Hsp90 inhibitor, ganetespib (G) or the Nrf2 activator, bardoxolone methyl (BM) can similarly suppress AR levels in 22Rv1 cells. Low doses of G and BM, alone or in combination, decreased both AR-FL and AR-V7 levels, and combined exposure to G+BM sensitized 22Rv1 cells to ENZ. Therefore, adjunct treatment with the phytochemical SFN or a safe pharmaceutical combination of G+BM may be effective against CRPC cells, especially those expressing AR-V7.

Indexed as

BenzamidesCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDown-RegulationDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIsothiocyanatesMaleMutationNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantReceptors, AndrogenSulfoxidesAR protein, humanBenzamidesenzalutamideIsothiocyanatesNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinReceptors, AndrogensulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID28901514
PMCPMC5780030
OpenAlexW2753147836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.